llvm-svn: 107985

llvm-svn: 107984

llvm-svn: 107983

llvm-svn: 107982

llvm-svn: 107981

llvm-svn: 107980

llvm-svn: 107979

llvm-svn: 107978

llvm-svn: 107977

llvm-svn: 107976

llvm-svn: 107975

llvm-svn: 107974

Note that this is a move -- we pretend that we were really looking
at the unqualified typeloc all along -- rather than a recursion, so
we don't follow the normal CRTP plan of going through
getDerived().TraverseTypeLoc.  If we did, we'd be traversing twice
for the same type (once as a QualifiedTypeLoc version of the type,
once as an UnqualifiedTypeLoc version of the type), which in effect
means we'd call VisitTypeLoc twice with the 'same' type.  This
solves that problem, at the cost of never seeing the qualified
version of the type (unless the client subclasses
TraverseQualifiedTypeLoc themselves).  It's not a perfect solution.
A perfect solution probably requires making QualifiedTypeLoc a
wrapper around TypeLoc -- like QualType is a wrapper around Type*
-- rather than being its own class in the type hierarchy.

Reviewed by wan.

llvm-svn: 107973

llvm-svn: 107972

llvm-svn: 107971

llvm-svn: 107970

llvm-svn: 107969

llvm-svn: 107968

llvm-svn: 107967

llvm-svn: 107966

llvm-svn: 107965

llvm-svn: 107964

llvm-svn: 107963

llvm-svn: 107962

llvm-svn: 107961

llvm-svn: 107960

llvm-svn: 107959

Unlike insertMachineInstrInMaps this does not guarantee live intervals will
remain correct. The caller will need to manually update intervals to account
for the changes made to the CFG.

llvm-svn: 107958

This fixes PR7602.

llvm-svn: 107957

llvm-svn: 107956

This fixes PR7601.

llvm-svn: 107955

llvm-svn: 107953

fields to use. 

llvm-svn: 107952

llvm-svn: 107951

llvm-svn: 107950

llvm-svn: 107949

llvm-svn: 107948

llvm-svn: 107947

jumps where possible and turning the TAILCALL marker in the instruction
asm string into a proper comment.

This eliminates a FIXME and is on the path to finishing:
rdar://7639610 - eliminate encoding and asm info for TAILJMPd TAILJMPr TAILJMPn, etc.

However, I can't eliminate the encodings for these instructions because the JIT
still exists and has its own copy of the encoder, sigh.

llvm-svn: 107946

consistency with other instructions that have lists of register operands.

llvm-svn: 107944