int test2(int * P, int* Q, int A, int B) {
        return P+A == P;
}

into:

test2:
        movl 4(%esp), %eax
        movl 12(%esp), %eax
        shll $2, %eax
        cmpl $0, %eax
        sete %al
        movzbl %al, %eax
        ret

instead of:

test2:
        movl 4(%esp), %eax
        movl 12(%esp), %ecx
        leal (%eax,%ecx,4), %ecx
        cmpl %eax, %ecx
        sete %al
        movzbl %al, %eax
        ret

ICC is producing worse code:

test2:
        movl      4(%esp), %eax                                 #8.5
        movl      12(%esp), %edx                                #8.5
        lea       (%edx,%edx), %ecx                             #9.9
        addl      %ecx, %ecx                                    #9.9
        addl      %eax, %ecx                                    #9.9
        cmpl      %eax, %ecx                                    #9.16
        movl      $0, %eax                                      #9.16
        sete      %al                                           #9.16
        ret                                                     #9.16

as is GCC (looks like our old code):

test2:
        movl    4(%esp), %edx
        movl    12(%esp), %eax
        leal    (%edx,%eax,4), %ecx
        cmpl    %edx, %ecx
        sete    %al
        movzbl  %al, %eax
        ret

llvm-svn: 19430

llvm-svn: 19429

llvm-svn: 19428

.LBB_Z5test0PdS__3:     # no_exit.1
        fldl data(,%eax,8)
        fldl 24(%esp)
        faddp %st(1)
        fstl 24(%esp)
        incl %eax
        movl $16000, %ecx
        sarl $3, %ecx
        cmpl %eax, %ecx
        fstpl 16(%esp)
        #FP_REG_KILL
        jg .LBB_Z5test0PdS__3   # no_exit.1

into:

.LBB_Z5test0PdS__3:     # no_exit.1
        fldl data(,%eax,8)
        fldl 24(%esp)
        faddp %st(1)
        fstl 24(%esp)
        incl %eax
        cmpl $2000, %eax
        fstpl 16(%esp)
        #FP_REG_KILL
        jl .LBB_Z5test0PdS__3   # no_exit.1

llvm-svn: 19427

gdb debugger doesn't get confused on which file it is reading (the one in
lib/System or the one in lib/System/{Win32,Unix})

llvm-svn: 19426

codegen this loop in stepanov:

no_exit.i:              ; preds = %entry, %no_exit.i, %then.i, %_Z5checkd.exit
        %i.0.0 = phi int [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.0.0, %no_exit.i ], [ %inc.0, %_Z5checkd.exit ], [ %inc.012, %then.i ]              ; <int> [#uses=3]
        %indvar = phi uint [ %indvar.next, %no_exit.i ], [ 0, %entry ], [ 0, %then.i ], [ 0, %_Z5checkd.exit ]          ; <uint> [#uses=3]
        %result_addr.i.0 = phi double [ %tmp.4.i.i, %no_exit.i ], [ 0.000000e+00, %entry ], [ 0.000000e+00, %then.i ], [ 0.000000e+00, %_Z5checkd.exit ]          ; <double> [#uses=1]
        %first_addr.0.i.2.rec = cast uint %indvar to int                ; <int> [#uses=1]
        %first_addr.0.i.2 = getelementptr [2000 x double]* %data, int 0, uint %indvar           ; <double*> [#uses=1]
        %inc.i.rec = add int %first_addr.0.i.2.rec, 1           ; <int> [#uses=1]
        %inc.i = getelementptr [2000 x double]* %data, int 0, int %inc.i.rec            ; <double*> [#uses=1]
        %tmp.3.i.i = load double* %first_addr.0.i.2             ; <double> [#uses=1]
        %tmp.4.i.i = add double %result_addr.i.0, %tmp.3.i.i            ; <double> [#uses=2]
        %tmp.2.i = seteq double* %inc.i, getelementptr ([2000 x double]* %data, int 0, int 2000)                ; <bool> [#uses=1]
        %indvar.next = add uint %indvar, 1              ; <uint> [#uses=1]
        br bool %tmp.2.i, label %_Z10accumulateIPddET0_T_S2_S1_.exit, label %no_exit.i

To this:

.LBB_Z4testIPddEvT_S1_T0__1:    # no_exit.i
        fldl data(,%eax,8)
        fldl 16(%esp)
        faddp %st(1)
        fstpl 16(%esp)
        incl %eax
        movl %eax, %ecx
        shll $3, %ecx
        cmpl $16000, %ecx
        #FP_REG_KILL
        jne .LBB_Z4testIPddEvT_S1_T0__1 # no_exit.i

instead of this:

.LBB_Z4testIPddEvT_S1_T0__1:    # no_exit.i
        fldl data(,%eax,8)
        fldl 16(%esp)
        faddp %st(1)
        fstpl 16(%esp)
        incl %eax
        leal data(,%eax,8), %ecx
        leal data+16000, %edx
        cmpl %edx, %ecx
        #FP_REG_KILL
        jne .LBB_Z4testIPddEvT_S1_T0__1 # no_exit.i

llvm-svn: 19425

llvm-svn: 19424

llvm-svn: 19423

llvm-svn: 19422

llvm-svn: 19421

of an ADDri (due to current restrictions on MachineOperand :( ).  This allows
us to generate:

        leal Data+16000, %edx

instead of:

        movl $Data, %edx
        addl $16000, %edx

llvm-svn: 19420

loops in stepanov to this:

.LBB_Z5test0PdS__2:     # no_exit.1
        fldl data(,%eax,8)
        fldl 24(%esp)
        faddp %st(1)
        fstl 24(%esp)
        incl %eax
        cmpl $2000, %eax
        fstpl 16(%esp)
        #FP_REG_KILL
        jl .LBB_Z5test0PdS__2

instead of this:

.LBB_Z5test0PdS__2:     # no_exit.1
        fldl data(,%eax,8)
        fldl 24(%esp)
        faddp %st(1)
        fstl 24(%esp)
        incl %eax
        movl $data, %ecx
        movl %ecx, %edx
        addl $16000, %edx
        subl %ecx, %edx
        movl %edx, %ecx
        sarl $2, %ecx
        shrl $29, %ecx
        addl %ecx, %edx
        sarl $3, %edx
        cmpl %edx, %eax
        fstpl 16(%esp)
        #FP_REG_KILL
        jl .LBB_Z5test0PdS__2

The old instruction selector produced:

.LBB_Z5test0PdS__2:     # no_exit.1
        fldl 24(%esp)
        faddl data(,%eax,8)
        fstl 24(%esp)
        movl %eax, %ecx
        incl %ecx
        incl %eax
        leal data+16000, %edx
        movl $data, %edi
        subl %edi, %edx
        movl %edx, %edi
        sarl $2, %edi
        shrl $29, %edi
        addl %edi, %edx
        sarl $3, %edx
        cmpl %edx, %ecx
        fstpl 16(%esp)
        #FP_REG_KILL
        jl .LBB_Z5test0PdS__2   # no_exit.1

Which is even worse!

llvm-svn: 19419

llvm-svn: 19418

values), and eliminate some switch statements.

llvm-svn: 19417

std::__pad<wchar_t, std::char_traits<wchar_t> >::_S_pad(std::ios_base&, wchar_t, wchar_t*, wchar_t const*, int, int, bool)

from libstdc++

llvm-svn: 19416

llvm-svn: 19415

Also, fix zero_extend from bool to i8, which fixes Shootout/objinst.

llvm-svn: 19414

llvm-svn: 19412

this classes uses a utility function in namespace std.  But Microsoft apparently
assumes everyone will "using namespace std;".  As LLVM doesn't....  Add a
"use std::_Distance;" to get it working.

llvm-svn: 19411

llvm-svn: 19410

llvm-svn: 19409

patch, all of SingleSource/UnitTests passes.

llvm-svn: 19408

llvm-svn: 19407

llvm-svn: 19406

llvm-svn: 19405

llvm-svn: 19404

llvm-svn: 19403

llvm-svn: 19402

llvm-svn: 19401

gets clobbered by a previous statement.  This fixes all calls finally.

llvm-svn: 19399

llvm-svn: 19398

llvm-svn: 19397

llvm-svn: 19396

llvm-svn: 19395

llvm-svn: 19394

on 64-bit Windows.

llvm-svn: 19393

llvm-svn: 19392

llvm-svn: 19391

llvm-svn: 19390

llvm-svn: 19389