Skip to content
  1. Aug 13, 2009
  2. Jul 14, 2009
  3. Jul 11, 2009
    • Torok Edwin's avatar
      assert(0) -> LLVM_UNREACHABLE. · 56d06597
      Torok Edwin authored
      Make llvm_unreachable take an optional string, thus moving the cerr<< out of
      line.
      LLVM_UNREACHABLE is now a simple wrapper that makes the message go away for
      NDEBUG builds.
      
      llvm-svn: 75379
      56d06597
  4. Jul 07, 2009
  5. Jun 23, 2009
  6. May 11, 2009
  7. May 09, 2009
  8. Apr 01, 2009
  9. Feb 17, 2009
  10. Jan 12, 2009
  11. Dec 09, 2008
  12. Dec 08, 2008
  13. Sep 04, 2008
  14. Jun 04, 2008
    • Duncan Sands's avatar
      Change packed struct layout so that field sizes · fc3c489b
      Duncan Sands authored
      are the same as in unpacked structs, only field
      positions differ.  This only matters for structs
      containing x86 long double or an apint; it may
      cause backwards compatibility problems if someone
      has bitcode containing a packed struct with a
      field of one of those types.
      The issue is that only 10 bytes are needed to
      hold an x86 long double: the store size is 10
      bytes, but the ABI size is 12 or 16 bytes (linux/
      darwin) which comes from rounding the store size
      up by the alignment.  Because it seemed silly not
      to pack an x86 long double into 10 bytes in a
      packed struct, this is what was done.  I now
      think this was a mistake.  Reserving the ABI size
      for an x86 long double field even in a packed
      struct makes things more uniform: the ABI size is
      now always used when reserving space for a type.
      This means that developers are less likely to
      make mistakes.  It also makes life easier for the
      CBE which otherwise could not represent all LLVM
      packed structs (PR2402).
      Front-end people might need to adjust the way
      they create LLVM structs - see following change
      to llvm-gcc.
      
      llvm-svn: 51928
      fc3c489b
  15. May 13, 2008
  16. Apr 14, 2008
  17. Mar 19, 2008
  18. Jan 29, 2008
  19. Jan 10, 2008
  20. Dec 29, 2007
  21. Dec 21, 2007
  22. Dec 13, 2007
  23. Dec 11, 2007
  24. Nov 09, 2007
  25. Nov 01, 2007
    • Duncan Sands's avatar
      Executive summary: getTypeSize -> getTypeStoreSize / getABITypeSize. · 44b8721d
      Duncan Sands authored
      The meaning of getTypeSize was not clear - clarifying it is important
      now that we have x86 long double and arbitrary precision integers.
      The issue with long double is that it requires 80 bits, and this is
      not a multiple of its alignment.  This gives a primitive type for
      which getTypeSize differed from getABITypeSize.  For arbitrary precision
      integers it is even worse: there is the minimum number of bits needed to
      hold the type (eg: 36 for an i36), the maximum number of bits that will
      be overwriten when storing the type (40 bits for i36) and the ABI size
      (i.e. the storage size rounded up to a multiple of the alignment; 64 bits
      for i36).
      
      This patch removes getTypeSize (not really - it is still there but
      deprecated to allow for a gradual transition).  Instead there is:
      
      (1) getTypeSizeInBits - a number of bits that suffices to hold all
      values of the type.  For a primitive type, this is the minimum number
      of bits.  For an i36 this is 36 bits.  For x86 long double it is 80.
      This corresponds to gcc's TYPE_PRECISION.
      
      (2) getTypeStoreSizeInBits - the maximum number of bits that is
      written when storing the type (or read when reading it).  For an
      i36 this is 40 bits, for an x86 long double it is 80 bits.  This
      is the size alias analysis is interested in (getTypeStoreSize
      returns the number of bytes).  There doesn't seem to be anything
      corresponding to this in gcc.
      
      (3) getABITypeSizeInBits - this is getTypeStoreSizeInBits rounded
      up to a multiple of the alignment.  For an i36 this is 64, for an
      x86 long double this is 96 or 128 depending on the OS.  This is the
      spacing between consecutive elements when you form an array out of
      this type (getABITypeSize returns the number of bytes).  This is
      TYPE_SIZE in gcc.
      
      Since successive elements in a SequentialType (arrays, pointers
      and vectors) need to be aligned, the spacing between them will be
      given by getABITypeSize.  This means that the size of an array
      is the length times the getABITypeSize.  It also means that GEP
      computations need to use getABITypeSize when computing offsets.
      Furthermore, if an alloca allocates several elements at once then
      these too need to be aligned, so the size of the alloca has to be
      the number of elements multiplied by getABITypeSize.  Logically
      speaking this doesn't have to be the case when allocating just
      one element, but it is simpler to also use getABITypeSize in this
      case.  So alloca's and mallocs should use getABITypeSize.  Finally,
      since gcc's only notion of size is that given by getABITypeSize, if
      you want to output assembler etc the same as gcc then getABITypeSize
      is the size you want.
      
      Since a store will overwrite no more than getTypeStoreSize bytes,
      and a read will read no more than that many bytes, this is the
      notion of size appropriate for alias analysis calculations.
      
      In this patch I have corrected all type size uses except some of
      those in ScalarReplAggregates, lib/Codegen, lib/Target (the hard
      cases).  I will get around to auditing these too at some point,
      but I could do with some help.
      
      Finally, I made one change which I think wise but others might
      consider pointless and suboptimal: in an unpacked struct the
      amount of space allocated for a field is now given by the ABI
      size rather than getTypeStoreSize.  I did this because every
      other place that reserves memory for a type (eg: alloca) now
      uses getABITypeSize, and I didn't want to make an exception
      for unpacked structs, i.e. I did it to make things more uniform.
      This only effects structs containing long doubles and arbitrary
      precision integers.  If someone wants to pack these types more
      tightly they can always use a packed struct.
      
      llvm-svn: 43620
      44b8721d
  26. Oct 29, 2007
  27. Oct 08, 2007
  28. Oct 01, 2007
  29. Sep 21, 2007
  30. Sep 17, 2007
  31. Sep 07, 2007
  32. Aug 05, 2007
  33. Aug 03, 2007
  34. May 03, 2007
  35. May 02, 2007
  36. May 01, 2007
  37. Apr 22, 2007
  38. Apr 09, 2007
Loading