Skip to content
  1. Jul 25, 2004
    • Chris Lattner's avatar
      4c1c1ac7
    • Chris Lattner's avatar
      New testcase for DSE · fb7dd4c1
      Chris Lattner authored
      llvm-svn: 15198
      fb7dd4c1
    • Chris Lattner's avatar
      Add support for free instructions · 924c68dc
      Chris Lattner authored
      llvm-svn: 15197
      924c68dc
    • Chris Lattner's avatar
      Fix the sense of joinable · bbe845b9
      Chris Lattner authored
      llvm-svn: 15196
      bbe845b9
    • Chris Lattner's avatar
      Remove linux/solaris specific stuff. · d1980dbe
      Chris Lattner authored
      llvm-svn: 15195
      d1980dbe
    • Chris Lattner's avatar
      This patch makes use of the infrastructure implemented before to safely and · ccc75d4f
      Chris Lattner authored
      aggressively coallesce live ranges even if they overlap.  Consider this LLVM
      code for example:
      
      int %test(int %X) {
              %Y = mul int %X, 1      ;; Codegens to Y = X
              %Z = add int %X, %Y
              ret int %Z
      }
      
      The mul is just there to get a copy into the code stream.  This produces
      this machine code:
      
       (0x869e5a8, LLVM BB @0x869b9a0):
              %reg1024 = mov <fi#-2>, 1, %NOREG, 0    ;; "X"
              %reg1025 = mov %reg1024                 ;; "Y"  (subsumed by X)
              %reg1026 = add %reg1024, %reg1025
              %EAX = mov %reg1026
              ret
      
      Note that the life times of reg1024 and reg1025 overlap, even though they
      contain the same value.  This results in this machine code:
      
      test:
              mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4]
              mov %ECX, %EAX
              add %EAX, %ECX
              ret
      
      Another, worse case involves loops and PHI nodes.  Consider this trivial loop:
      testcase:
      
      int %test2(int %X) {
      entry:
              br label %Loop
      Loop:
              %Y = phi int [%X, %entry], [%Z, %Loop]
              %Z = add int %Y, 1
              %cond = seteq int %Z, 100
              br bool %cond, label %Out, label %Loop
      Out:
              ret int %Z
      }
      
      Because of interactions between the PHI elimination pass and the register
      allocator, this got compiled to this code:
      
      test2:
              mov %ECX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4]
      .LBBtest2_1:
      ***     mov %EAX, %ECX
              inc %EAX
              cmp %EAX, 100
      ***     mov %ECX, %EAX
              jne .LBBtest2_1
      
              ret
      
      Or on powerpc, this code:
      
      _test2:
              mflr r0
              stw r0, 8(r1)
              stwu r1, -60(r1)
      .LBB_test2_1:
              addi r2, r3, 1
              cmpwi cr0, r2, 100
      ***     or r3, r2, r2
              bne cr0, .LBB_test2_1
      
      ***     or r3, r2, r2
              lwz r0, 68(r1)
              mtlr r0
              addi r1, r1, 60
              blr 0
      
      
      
      With this improvement in place, we now generate this code for these two
      testcases, which is what we want:
      
      
      test:
              mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4]
              add %EAX, %EAX
              ret
      
      test2:
              mov %EAX, DWORD PTR [%ESP + 4]
      .LBBtest2_1:
              inc %EAX
              cmp %EAX, 100
              jne .LBBtest2_1 # Loop
              ret
      
      Or on PPC:
      
      _test2:
              mflr r0
              stw r0, 8(r1)
              stwu r1, -60(r1)
      .LBB_test2_1:
              addi r3, r3, 1
              cmpwi cr0, r3, 100
              bne cr0, .LBB_test2_1
      
              lwz r0, 68(r1)
              mtlr r0
              addi r1, r1, 60
              blr 0
      
      
      Static numbers for spill code loads/stores/reg-reg copies (smaller is better):
      
      em3d:       before: 47/25/26         after: 44/22/24
      164.gzip:   before: 433/245/310      after: 403/231/278
      175.vpr:    before: 3721/2189/1581   after: 4144/2081/1423
      176.gcc:    before: 26195/8866/9235  after: 25942/8082/8275
      186.crafty: before: 4295/2587/3079   after: 4119/2519/2916
      252.eon:    before: 12754/7585/5803  after: 12508/7425/5643
      256.bzip2:  before: 463/226/315      after: 482:241/309
      
      
      Runtime perf number samples on X86:
      
      gzip: before: 41.09 after: 39.86
      bzip2: runtime: before: 56.71s after: 57.07s
      gcc: before: 6.16 after: 6.12
      eon: before: 2.03s after: 2.00s
      llvm-svn: 15194
      ccc75d4f
    • Chris Lattner's avatar
      Make a method const, no functionality changes · c8002d49
      Chris Lattner authored
      llvm-svn: 15193
      c8002d49
    • Chris Lattner's avatar
      I think that V8 should coallesce registers, don't you? · 51ebdec5
      Chris Lattner authored
      llvm-svn: 15192
      51ebdec5
    • Alkis Evlogimenos's avatar
      Use name.empty() instead of testing against equality with the empty · 74614b0c
      Alkis Evlogimenos authored
      string.
      
      llvm-svn: 15191
      74614b0c
    • Alkis Evlogimenos's avatar
      Disallow creation of named values of type void. · 2f130282
      Alkis Evlogimenos authored
      llvm-svn: 15190
      2f130282
    • Chris Lattner's avatar
      Fix a bug where we incorrectly value numbered the first PHI definition the · 83b9c50f
      Chris Lattner authored
      same as the PHI use.  This is not correct as the PHI use value is different
      depending on which branch is taken.  This fixes espresso with aggressive
      coallescing, and perhaps others.
      
      llvm-svn: 15189
      83b9c50f
    • Chris Lattner's avatar
      Fix a bug in the range remover · af7e898e
      Chris Lattner authored
      llvm-svn: 15188
      af7e898e
    • Chris Lattner's avatar
      Add debugging output for joining assignments · 0e58e5e4
      Chris Lattner authored
      llvm-svn: 15187
      0e58e5e4
  2. Jul 24, 2004
  3. Jul 23, 2004
Loading