Merge consecutive if-regions if they contain identical statements.
Both transformations reduce number of branches.  The transformation
is guarded by a target-hook, and is currently enabled only for +R600,
but the correctness has been tested on X86 target using a variety of
CPU benchmarks.

Patch by: Mei Ye

llvm-svn: 187278

CGSCC pass manager. This should insulate the inlining decisions from the
vectorization decisions, however it may have both compile time and code
size problems so it is just an experimental option right now.

Adding this based on a discussion with Arnold and it seems at least
worth having this flag for us to both run some experiments to see if
this strategy is workable. It may solve some of the regressions seen
with the loop vectorizer.

llvm-svn: 184698

This commit completely removes what is left of the simplify-libcalls
pass.  All of the functionality has now been migrated to the instcombine
and functionattrs passes.  The following C API functions are now NOPs:

  1. LLVMAddSimplifyLibCallsPass
  2. LLVMPassManagerBuilderSetDisableSimplifyLibCalls

llvm-svn: 184459

llvm-svn: 184089

llvm-svn: 184084

Jeffrey Yasskin volunteered to benchmark the vectorizer on -O2 or -Os when compiling chrome. This patch adds a new flag to enable vectorization on all levels and not only on -O3. It should go away once we make a decision.

llvm-svn: 183456

the things, and renames it to CBindingWrapping.h.  I also moved 
CBindingWrapping.h into Support/.

This new file just contains the macros for defining different wrap/unwrap 
methods.

The calls to those macros, as well as any custom wrap/unwrap definitions 
(like for array of Values for example), are put into corresponding C++ 
headers.

Doing this required some #include surgery, since some .cpp files relied 
on the fact that including Wrap.h implicitly caused the inclusion of a 
bunch of other things.

This also now means that the C++ headers will include their corresponding 
C API headers; for example Value.h must include llvm-c/Core.h.  I think 
this is harmless, since the C API headers contain just external function 
declarations and some C types, so I don't believe there should be any 
nasty dependency issues here.

llvm-svn: 180881

or the C++ files themselves. This enables people to use
just a C compiler to interoperate with LLVM.

llvm-svn: 180063

SLPVectorizer: Make it a function pass and add code for hoisting the vector-gather sequence out of loops.

llvm-svn: 179562

Add an option -vectorize-slp-aggressive for running the BB vectorizer. Make -fslp-vectorize run the slp-vectorizer.

llvm-svn: 179508

llvm-svn: 179505

llvm-svn: 176793

Always print options that differ from their implicit default. At least
for simple option types.

llvm-svn: 176572

This way, clang -mllvm -print-options shows that the driver is overriding it.

llvm-svn: 176569

Because BBVectorize may significantly shorten a loop body, unroll
again after vectorization. This is especially important when using
runtime or partial unrolling.

llvm-svn: 173730

builder these days, and this thing hasn't seen updates for a very long
time.

llvm-svn: 171741

Move the loop vectorizer from O2 to O3. It looks like the increase in code size actually hurts the performance on many programs.

llvm-svn: 171471

llvm-svn: 170902

Enable the loop vectorizer in clang and not in the pass manager, so that we can disable it in clang.

llvm-svn: 170470

llvm-svn: 170416

llvm-svn: 170267

llvm-svn: 170246

llvm-svn: 170172

llvm-svn: 170166

llvm-svn: 170162

Enable the Loop Vectorizer by default for O2 and O3. Disable if-conversion by default. I plan to revert this patch later today.

llvm-svn: 170157

LoopVectorizer: Use the "optsize" attribute to decide if we are allowed to increase the function size.

llvm-svn: 170004

LoopVectorizer: When -Os is used, vectorize only loops that dont require a tail loop. There is no testcase because I dont know of a way to initialize the loop vectorizer pass without adding an additional hidden flag. 

llvm-svn: 169950

llvm-svn: 169774

Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.

Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]

llvm-svn: 169131

llvm-svn: 168928

llvm-svn: 168049

llvm-svn: 167036

llvm-svn: 166948

Change the PassManagerBuilder (used by -O3) loop vectorizer flag from -vectorize to -vectorize-loops because we dont want to share the same flag as the bb-vectorizer.

llvm-svn: 166937

list of externals. This makes sense since a shared library with no symbols
can still be useful if it has static constructors.

llvm-svn: 166795

llvm-svn: 166643

llvm-svn: 166642

over the implicitly-formed-and-nesting CGSCC pass manager and function
pass managers, especially when using them on the opt commandline or
using extension points in the module builder. The '-barrier' opt flag
(or the pass itself) will create a no-op module pass in the pipeline,
resetting the pass manager stack, and allowing the creation of a new
pipeline of function passes or CGSCC passes to be created that is
independent from any previous pipelines.

For example, this can be used to test running two CGSCC passes in
independent CGSCC pass managers as opposed to in the same CGSCC pass
manager. It also allows us to introduce a further hack into the
PassManagerBuilder to separate the O0 pipeline extension passes from the
always-inliner's CGSCC pass manager, which they likely do not want to
participate in... At the very least none of the Sanitizer passes want
this behavior.

This fixes a bug with ASan at O0 currently, and I'll commit the ASan
test which covers this pass. I'm happy to add a test case that this pass
exists and works, but not sure how much time folks would like me to
spend adding test cases for the details of its behavior of partition
pass managers.... The whole thing is just vile, and mostly intended to
unblock ASan, so I'm hoping to rip this all out in a brave new pass
manager world.

llvm-svn: 166172

llvm-svn: 166112