- Sep 14, 2012
-
-
Chandler Carruth authored
llvm-svn: 163889
-
Chandler Carruth authored
llvm-svn: 163888
-
Chandler Carruth authored
llvm-svn: 163887
-
NAKAMURA Takumi authored
llvm-svn: 163886
-
NAKAMURA Takumi authored
llvm-svn: 163885
-
Chandler Carruth authored
the injected class name of a dependent base class here. llvm-svn: 163884
-
Chandler Carruth authored
This is essentially a ground up re-think of the SROA pass in LLVM. It was initially inspired by a few problems with the existing pass: - It is subject to the bane of my existence in optimizations: arbitrary thresholds. - It is overly conservative about which constructs can be split and promoted. - The vector value replacement aspect is separated from the splitting logic, missing many opportunities where splitting and vector value formation can work together. - The splitting is entirely based around the underlying type of the alloca, despite this type often having little to do with the reality of how that memory is used. This is especially prevelant with unions and base classes where we tail-pack derived members. - When splitting fails (often due to the thresholds), the vector value replacement (again because it is separate) can kick in for preposterous cases where we simply should have split the value. This results in forming i1024 and i2048 integer "bit vectors" that tremendously slow down subsequnet IR optimizations (due to large APInts) and impede the backend's lowering. The new design takes an approach that fundamentally is not susceptible to many of these problems. It is the result of a discusison between myself and Duncan Sands over IRC about how to premptively avoid these types of problems and how to do SROA in a more principled way. Since then, it has evolved and grown, but this remains an important aspect: it fixes real world problems with the SROA process today. First, the transform of SROA actually has little to do with replacement. It has more to do with splitting. The goal is to take an aggregate alloca and form a composition of scalar allocas which can replace it and will be most suitable to the eventual replacement by scalar SSA values. The actual replacement is performed by mem2reg (and in the future SSAUpdater). The splitting is divided into four phases. The first phase is an analysis of the uses of the alloca. This phase recursively walks uses, building up a dense datastructure representing the ranges of the alloca's memory actually used and checking for uses which inhibit any aspects of the transform such as the escape of a pointer. Once we have a mapping of the ranges of the alloca used by individual operations, we compute a partitioning of the used ranges. Some uses are inherently splittable (such as memcpy and memset), while scalar uses are not splittable. The goal is to build a partitioning that has the minimum number of splits while placing each unsplittable use in its own partition. Overlapping unsplittable uses belong to the same partition. This is the target split of the aggregate alloca, and it maximizes the number of scalar accesses which become accesses to their own alloca and candidates for promotion. Third, we re-walk the uses of the alloca and assign each specific memory access to all the partitions touched so that we have dense use-lists for each partition. Finally, we build a new, smaller alloca for each partition and rewrite each use of that partition to use the new alloca. During this phase the pass will also work very hard to transform uses of an alloca into a form suitable for promotion, including forming vector operations, speculating loads throguh PHI nodes and selects, etc. After splitting is complete, each newly refined alloca that is a candidate for promotion to a scalar SSA value is run through mem2reg. There are lots of reasonably detailed comments in the source code about the design and algorithms, and I'm going to be trying to improve them in subsequent commits to ensure this is well documented, as the new pass is in many ways more complex than the old one. Some of this is still a WIP, but the current state is reasonbly stable. It has passed bootstrap, the nightly test suite, and Duncan has run it successfully through the ACATS and DragonEgg test suites. That said, it remains behind a default-off flag until the last few pieces are in place, and full testing can be done. Specific areas I'm looking at next: - Improved comments and some code cleanup from reviews. - SSAUpdater and enabling this pass inside the CGSCC pass manager. - Some datastructure tuning and compile-time measurements. - More aggressive FCA splitting and vector formation. Many thanks to Duncan Sands for the thorough final review, as well as Benjamin Kramer for lots of review during the process of writing this pass, and Daniel Berlin for reviewing the data structures and algorithms and general theory of the pass. Also, several other people on IRC, over lunch tables, etc for lots of feedback and advice. llvm-svn: 163883
-
- Sep 13, 2012
-
-
Dan Gohman authored
loads and stores. llvm-svn: 163844
-
Dan Gohman authored
llvm-svn: 163817
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
This is common when storing to global variables. llvm-svn: 163809
-
Nadav Rotem authored
llvm-svn: 163808
-
Bill Wendling authored
Use Nick's suggestion of storing a large NULL into the GV instead of memset, which requires TargetData. llvm-svn: 163799
-
Dmitri Gribenko authored
* wrap code blocks in \code ... \endcode; * refer to parameter names in paragraphs correctly (\arg is not what most people want -- it starts a new paragraph). llvm-svn: 163790
-
Bill Wendling authored
This function writes out the current values of the counters and then resets them. This can be used similarly to the __gcov_flush function to sync the counters when need be. For instance, in a situation where the application doesn't exit. <rdar://problem/12185886> llvm-svn: 163757
-
- Sep 12, 2012
-
-
-
Manman Ren authored
to the default target. llvm-svn: 163724
-
Manman Ren authored
"#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)" No functional change. Update r163344. llvm-svn: 163679
-
- Sep 11, 2012
-
-
Manman Ren authored
a pair of switch/branch where both depend on the value of the same variable and the default case of the first switch/branch goes to the second switch/branch. Code clean up and fixed a few issues: 1> handling the case where some cases of the 2nd switch are invalidated 2> correctly calculate the weight for the 2nd switch when it is a conditional eq Testing case is modified from Alastair's original patch. llvm-svn: 163635
-
NAKAMURA Takumi authored
llvm-svn: 163593
-
Alex Rosenberg authored
Add a pass that renames everything with metasyntatic names. This works well after using bugpoint to reduce the confusion presented by the original names, which no longer mean what they used to. llvm-svn: 163592
-
- Sep 10, 2012
-
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
llvm-svn: 163503
-
Hans Wennborg authored
llvm-svn: 163491
-
Nick Lewycky authored
llvm-svn: 163485
-
- Sep 09, 2012
-
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
llvm-svn: 163480
-
- Sep 08, 2012
-
-
Andrew Trick authored
Patch and test case by Alastair Murray! llvm-svn: 163437
-
- Sep 07, 2012
-
-
Hans Wennborg authored
llvm-svn: 163378
-
- Sep 06, 2012
-
-
Manman Ren authored
No functional change. llvm-svn: 163344
-
Hans Wennborg authored
The lookup tables did not get built in a deterministic order. This makes them get built in the order that the corresponding phi nodes were found. llvm-svn: 163305
-
Hans Wennborg authored
This adds a transformation to SimplifyCFG that attemps to turn switch instructions into loads from lookup tables. It works on switches that are only used to initialize one or more phi nodes in a common successor basic block, for example: int f(int x) { switch (x) { case 0: return 5; case 1: return 4; case 2: return -2; case 5: return 7; case 6: return 9; default: return 42; } This speeds up the code by removing the hard-to-predict jump, and reduces code size by removing the code for the jump targets. llvm-svn: 163302
-
Jim Grosbach authored
No functional change. llvm-svn: 163279
-
Roman Divacky authored
llvm-svn: 163258
-
- Sep 05, 2012
-
-
Kostya Serebryany authored
llvm-svn: 163205
-
Kostya Serebryany authored
llvm-svn: 163199
-
Dan Gohman authored
pointers-to-strong-pointers may be in play. These can lead to retains and releases happening in unstructured ways, foiling the optimizer. This fixes rdar://12150909. llvm-svn: 163180
-
Jakub Staszak authored
llvm-svn: 163179
-
- Sep 04, 2012
-
-
Jakub Staszak authored
Doesn't set MadeChange to TRUE if BypassSlowDivision doesn't change anything. llvm-svn: 163165
-
Jakub Staszak authored
Also a few minor changes: - use pre-inc instead of post-inc - use isa instead of dyn_cast - 80 col - trailing spaces llvm-svn: 163164
-
Preston Gurd authored
- CodeGenPrepare pass for identifying div/rem ops - Backend specifies the type mapping using addBypassSlowDivType - Enabled only for Intel Atom with O2 32-bit -> 8-bit - Replace IDIV with instructions which test its value and use DIVB if the value is positive and less than 256. - In the case when the quotient and remainder of a divide are used a DIV and a REM instruction will be present in the IR. In the non-Atom case they are both lowered to IDIVs and CSE removes the redundant IDIV instruction, using the quotient and remainder from the first IDIV. However, due to this optimization CSE is not able to eliminate redundant IDIV instructions because they are located in different basic blocks. This is overcome by calculating both the quotient (DIV) and remainder (REM) in each basic block that is inserted by the optimization and reusing the result values when a subsequent DIV or REM instruction uses the same operands. - Test cases check for the presents of the optimization when calculating either the quotient, remainder, or both. Patch by Tyler Nowicki! llvm-svn: 163150
-
Nadav Rotem authored
Scan the body of the loop and find instructions that may trap. Use this information when deciding if it is safe to hoist or sink instructions. Notice that we can optimize the search of instructions that may throw in the case of nested loops. rdar://11518836 llvm-svn: 163132
-
- Sep 02, 2012
-
-
Nadav Rotem authored
For example, the ARM target does not have efficient ISel handling for vector selects with scalar conditions. This patch adds a TLI hook which allows the different targets to report which selects are supported well and which selects should be converted to CF duting codegen prepare. llvm-svn: 163093
-