Adding another CU-wide list, in this case of imported_modules (since they
should be relatively rare, it seemed better to add a list where each element
had a "context" value, rather than add a (usually empty) list to every scope).
This takes care of DW_TAG_imported_module, but to fully address PR14606 we'll
need to expand this to cover DW_TAG_imported_declaration too.

llvm-svn: 179836

arguments in entry BBs.

llvm-svn: 179824

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D598

llvm-svn: 179725

This is a rework of the broken parts in r179373 which were subsequently reverted in r179374 due to incompatibility with C++98 compilers.  This version should be ok under C++98.

llvm-svn: 179520

llvm-svn: 179478

llvm-svn: 179452

MI-Sched cleanup. If an instruction has no valid sched class, do not attempt to check for a variant.

llvm-svn: 179451

The register allocator expects minimal physreg live ranges. Schedule
physreg copies accordingly. This is slightly tricky when they occur in
the middle of the scheduling region. For now, this is handled by
rescheduling the copy when its associated instruction is
scheduled. Eventually we may instead bundle them, but only if we can
preserve the bundles as parallel copies during regalloc.

llvm-svn: 179449

CostModel: increase the default cost of supported floating point operations from 1 to two. Fixed a few tests that changes because now the cost of one insert + a vector operation on two doubles is lower than two scalar operations on doubles.

llvm-svn: 179413

You can't copy an OwningPtr, and move semantics aren't available in C++98.

llvm-svn: 179374

llvm-svn: 179373

llvm-svn: 179355

When debugging performance regressions we often ask ourselves if the regression
that we see is due to poor isel/sched/ra or due to some micro-architetural
problem.  When comparing two code sequences one good way to rule out front-end
bottlenecks (and other the issues) is to force code alignment. This pass adds
a flag that forces the alignment of all of the basic blocks in the program.

llvm-svn: 179353

llvm-svn: 179275

In the simple and triangle if-conversion cases, when CopyAndPredicateBlock is
used because the to-be-predicated block has other predecessors, we need to
explicitly remove the old copied block from the successors list. Normally if
conversion relies on TII->AnalyzeBranch combined with BB->CorrectExtraCFGEdges
to cleanup the successors list, but if the predicated block contained an
un-analyzable branch (such as a now-predicated return), then this will fail.

These extra successors were causing a problem on PPC because it was causing
later passes (such as PPCEarlyReturm) to leave dead return-only basic blocks in
the code.

llvm-svn: 179227

The target hooks are getting out of hand. What does it mean to run
before or after regalloc anyway? Allowing either Pass* or AnalysisID
pass identification should make it much easier for targets to use the
substitutePass and insertPass APIs, and create less need for badly
named target hooks.

llvm-svn: 179140

therefore not at all) of the pc or statement list. We also don't
need to emit the compilation dir so save so space and time
and don't bother.

Fix up the testcase accordingly and verify that we don't emit
the attributes or the items that they use.

llvm-svn: 179114

This pattern occurs in SROA output due to the way vector arguments are lowered
on ARM.

The testcase from PR15525 now compiles into this, which is better than the code
we got with the old scalarrepl:
_Store:
	ldr.w	r9, [sp]
	vmov	d17, r3, r9
	vmov	d16, r1, r2
	vst1.8	{d16, d17}, [r0]
	bx	lr

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D647

llvm-svn: 179106

a relocation across sections. Do this for DW_AT_stmt list in the
skeleton CU and check the relocations in the debug_info section.

Add a FIXME for multiple CUs.

llvm-svn: 178969

llvm-svn: 178949

We used to do "SmallString += CUID", which is incorrect, since CUID will
be truncated to a char.

rdar://problem/13573833

llvm-svn: 178941

This fixes PEI as previously described, but correctly handles the case where
the instruction defining the virtual register to be scavenged is the first in
the block. Arnold provided me with a bugpoint-reduced test case, but even that
seems too large to use as a regression test. If I'm successful in cleaning it
up then I'll commit that as well.

Original commit message:

    This change fixes a bug that I introduced in r178058. After a register is
    scavenged using one of the available spills slots the instruction defining the
    virtual register needs to be moved to after the spill code. The scavenger has
    already processed the defining instruction so that registers killed by that
    instruction are available for definition in that same instruction. Unfortunately,
    after this, the scavenger needs to iterate through the spill code and then
    visit, again, the instruction that defines the now-scavenged register. In order
    to avoid confusion, the register scavenger needs the ability to 'back up'
    through the spill code so that it can again process the instructions in the
    appropriate order. Prior to this fix, once the scavenger reached the
    just-moved instruction, it would assert if it killed any registers because,
    having already processed the instruction, it believed they were undefined.

    Unfortunately, I don't yet have a small test case. Thanks to Pranav Bhandarkar
    for diagnosing the problem and testing this fix.

llvm-svn: 178919

During LTO, the target options on functions within the same Module may
change. This would necessitate resetting some of the back-end. Do this for X86,
because it's a Friday afternoon.

llvm-svn: 178917

Reverting because this breaks one of the LTO builders. Original commit message:

    This change fixes a bug that I introduced in r178058. After a register is
    scavenged using one of the available spills slots the instruction defining the
    virtual register needs to be moved to after the spill code. The scavenger has
    already processed the defining instruction so that registers killed by that
    instruction are available for definition in that same instruction. Unfortunately,
    after this, the scavenger needs to iterate through the spill code and then
    visit, again, the instruction that defines the now-scavenged register. In order
    to avoid confusion, the register scavenger needs the ability to 'back up'
    through the spill code so that it can again process the instructions in the
    appropriate order. Prior to this fix, once the scavenger reached the
    just-moved instruction, it would assert if it killed any registers because,
    having already processed the instruction, it believed they were undefined.

    Unfortunately, I don't yet have a small test case. Thanks to Pranav Bhandarkar
    for diagnosing the problem and testing this fix.

llvm-svn: 178916

This change fixes a bug that I introduced in r178058. After a register is
scavenged using one of the available spills slots the instruction defining the
virtual register needs to be moved to after the spill code. The scavenger has
already processed the defining instruction so that registers killed by that
instruction are available for definition in that same instruction. Unfortunately,
after this, the scavenger needs to iterate through the spill code and then
visit, again, the instruction that defines the now-scavenged register. In order
to avoid confusion, the register scavenger needs the ability to 'back up'
through the spill code so that it can again process the instructions in the
appropriate order. Prior to this fix, once the scavenger reached the
just-moved instruction, it would assert if it killed any registers because,
having already processed the instruction, it believed they were undefined.

Unfortunately, I don't yet have a small test case. Thanks to Pranav Bhandarkar
for diagnosing the problem and testing this fix.

llvm-svn: 178845

llvm-svn: 178823

For now, just save the compile time since the ConvergingScheduler
heuristics don't use this analysis. We'll probably enable it later
after compile-time investigation.

llvm-svn: 178822

I'm getting more serious about tuning and enabling on x86/ARM. Start
by making the trace readable.

llvm-svn: 178821

On certain architectures we can support efficient vectorized version of
instructions if the operand value is uniform (splat) or a constant scalar.
An example of this is a vector shift on x86.

We can efficiently support

for (i = 0 ; i < ; i += 4)
  w[0:3] = v[0:3] << <2, 2, 2, 2>

but not

for (i = 0; i < ; i += 4)
  w[0:3] = v[0:3] << x[0:3]

This patch adds a parameter to getArithmeticInstrCost to further qualify operand
values as uniform or uniform constant.

Targets can then choose to return a different cost for instructions with such
operand values.

A follow-up commit will test this feature on x86.

radar://13576547

llvm-svn: 178807

There is a difference for FORM_ref_addr between DWARF 2 and DWARF 3+.
Since Eric is against guarding DWARF 2 ref_addr with DarwinGDBCompat, we are
still in discussion on how to handle this.

The correct solution is to update our header to say version 4 instead of version
2 and update tool chains as well.

rdar://problem/13559431

llvm-svn: 178806

llvm-svn: 178804

llvm-svn: 178771

the target system.

It was hard-coded to 4 bytes before. I can't get llvm to generate a
ref_addr on a reasonably sized testing case.

rdar://problem/13559431

llvm-svn: 178722

For this we need to use a libcall.  Previously LLVM didn't implement
libcall support for frem, so I've added it in the usual
straightforward manner.  A test case from the bug report is included.

llvm-svn: 178639

llvm-svn: 178624

llvm-svn: 178623

It it still possible to extract information from itineraries, for
example.

llvm-svn: 178582

This should fix the PPC buildbots.

llvm-svn: 178558

The new instruction scheduling models provide information about the
number of cycles consumed on each processor resource. This makes it
possible to estimate ILP more accurately than simply counting
instructions / issue width.

The functions getResourceDepth() and getResourceLength() now identify
the limiting processor resource, and return a cycle count based on that.

This gives more precise resource information, particularly in traces
that use one resource a lot more than others.

llvm-svn: 178553

This is helps on architectures where i8,i16 are not legal but we have byte, and
short loads/stores. Allowing us to merge copies like the one below on ARM.

copy(char *a, char *b, int n) {
 do {
   int t0 = a[0];
   int t1 = a[1];
   b[0] = t0;
   b[1] = t1;

radar://13536387

llvm-svn: 178546