As these two instructions in AVX extension are privileged instructions for
special purpose, it's only expected to be used in inlined assembly.

llvm-svn: 179266

This patch is revised based on patch from Victor Umansky
<victor.umansky@intel.com>. More cases are handled in X86's bool
simplification, i.e.
- SETCC_CARRY
- value is truncated to i1 with AND

As a by-product, PR5443 is also fixed.

llvm-svn: 179265

llvm-svn: 179263

llvm-svn: 179262

llvm-svn: 179259

The object was already checked in, but was not being tested.

llvm-svn: 179256

It was returning the loaded address of the section containing the relocation,
which really doesn't seem to be the intent of this function.

llvm-svn: 179255

Because of how predication in implemented on PPC (only for branches), I think
that this is the right thing to do.  No functionality change intended.

llvm-svn: 179252

llvm-svn: 179249

llvm-svn: 179248

llvm-svn: 179247

llvm-svn: 179244

llvm-svn: 179243

llvm-svn: 179241

Add support for the COFF relocation types IMAGE_REL_I386_DIR32NB and
IMAGE_REL_AMD64_ADDR32NB for 32- and 64-bit respectively. These are
similar to normal 4-byte relocations except that they do not include
the base address of the image.

Image-relative relocations are used for debug information (32-bit) and
SEH unwind tables (64-bit).

A new MCSymbolRef variant called 'VK_COFF_IMGREL32' is introduced to
specify such relocations. For AT&T assembly, this variant can be accessed
using the symbol suffix '@imgrel'.

llvm-svn: 179240

llvm-svn: 179239

In the simple and triangle if-conversion cases, when CopyAndPredicateBlock is
used because the to-be-predicated block has other predecessors, we need to
explicitly remove the old copied block from the successors list. Normally if
conversion relies on TII->AnalyzeBranch combined with BB->CorrectExtraCFGEdges
to cleanup the successors list, but if the predicated block contained an
un-analyzable branch (such as a now-predicated return), then this will fail.

These extra successors were causing a problem on PPC because it was causing
later passes (such as PPCEarlyReturm) to leave dead return-only basic blocks in
the code.

llvm-svn: 179227

llvm-svn: 179226

These changes are based on commit responses for r179135.

llvm-svn: 179225

llvm-svn: 179224

llvm-svn: 179223

temporarily while we work on plumbing through some changes to continue
supporting gdb on darwin.

This reverts commit r179122.

llvm-svn: 179222

Compact unwind has an encoding for when we're not able to generate compact
unwind and must generate an EH frame instead. Track that, but still emit that CU
encoding.

llvm-svn: 179220

llvm-svn: 179215

This avoids a nasty const correctness issue (AnalysisIDs are const, Pass* isn't).

llvm-svn: 179213

If anyone objects please let me know.

llvm-svn: 179212

In the X86 back end, getMemoryOperandNo() returns the offset
into the operand array of the start of the memory reference descriptor.

Additional code in EncodeInstruction provides an additional adjustment.

This patch places that additional code in a separate function,
called getOperandBias, so that any caller of getMemoryOperandNo
can also call getOperandBias.

llvm-svn: 179211

wasn't always the start of the operand.  If there was a symbol reference, then
Start pointed to that token.  It's very likely there are other places that need
to be updated.

llvm-svn: 179210

to disable following tests for Hexagon that require direct object
generation support.

DebugInfo/dwarf-public-names.ll
DebugInfo/dwarf-version.ll
DebugInfo/member-pointers.ll
DebugInfo/namespace.ll
DebugInfo/two-cus-from-same-file.ll

Fixes bug 15616 - http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15616

llvm-svn: 179209

Make the SLP store-merger less paranoid about function calls. We check for function calls when we check if it is safe to sink instructions.

llvm-svn: 179207

llvm-svn: 179206

llvm-svn: 179205

I've not seen this happen in practice, and probably can't until we start
allowing decrement-counter-based conditional branches to be double predicated,
but just in case, don't allow predication of a diamond in which both sides have
ctr-defining branches. Even though the branching behavior of these can be
predicated, the counter-decrementing behavior cannot be.

llvm-svn: 179199

Test cases that regressed due to r179115, plus a few more, were added in
r179182.  Original commit message below:

[ms-inline asm] Use parsePrimaryExpr in lieu of parseExpression if we need to
parse an identifier.  Otherwise, parseExpression may parse multiple tokens,
which makes it impossible to properly compute an immediate displacement.
An example of such a case is the source operand (i.e., [Symbol + ImmDisp]) in
the below example:

 __asm mov eax, [Symbol + ImmDisp]

Part of rdar://13611297

llvm-svn: 179187

21 more little piglits with radeonsi.

Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 179186

Mips32 code as Mips16 unless it can't be compiled as Mips 16. For now this
would happen as long as floating point instructions are not needed.
Probably it would also make sense to compile as mips32 if atomic operations
are needed too. There may be other cases too.

A module pass prescans the IR and adds the mips16 or nomips16 attribute
to functions depending on the functions needs.

Mips 16 mode can result in a 40% code compression by utililizing 16 bit
encoding of many instructions.

The hope is for this to replace the traditional gcc way of dealing with
Mips16 code using floating point which involves essentially using soft float
but with a library implemented using mips32 floating point. This gcc 
method also requires creating stubs so that Mips32 code can interact with
these Mips 16 functions that have floating point needs. My conjecture is
that in reality this traditional gcc method would never win over this
new method.

I will be implementing the traditional gcc method also. Some of it is already
done but I needed to do the stubs to finish the work and those required
this mips16/32 mixed mode capability.

I have more ideas for to make this new method much better and I think the old
method will just live in llvm for anyone that needs the backward compatibility
but I don't for what reason that would be needed.

llvm-svn: 179185

symbol with multiple .type declarations.

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D607

llvm-svn: 179184

llvm-svn: 179179

Since we only ever instantiate with a type that is a MachOType instantiation,
we don't need to pass template argument.

llvm-svn: 179178

llvm-svn: 179176