- Jan 24, 2014
-
-
Venkatraman Govindaraju authored
Add test cases to check parsing of v9 double registers and their aliased quad registers. llvm-svn: 199974
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 199971
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 199969
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 199968
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 199967
-
Chandler Carruth authored
We completely skipped promotion in LICM if the loop has a preheader or dedicated exits, but not *both*. We hoist if there is a preheader, and sink if there are dedicated exits, but either hoisting or sinking can move loop invariant code out of the loop! I have no idea if this has a practical consequence. If anyone has ideas for a test case, let me know. llvm-svn: 199966
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 199965
-
Chandler Carruth authored
literal that bakes a pass name and forces parsing it in the pass manager. llvm-svn: 199963
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 199955
-
- Jan 23, 2014
-
-
Eric Christopher authored
the existence of comdat/special sections. llvm-svn: 199954
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 199951
-
Kevin Enderby authored
registers in memory addresses that do not match the index register. As it does for .att_syntax. rdar://15887380 llvm-svn: 199948
-
Kevin Enderby authored
scale factors in memory addresses. As it does for .att_syntax. It was producing: Assertion failed: (((Scale == 1 || Scale == 2 || Scale == 4 || Scale == 8)) && "Invalid scale!"), function CreateMem, file /Volumes/SandBox/llvm/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp, line 1133. rdar://14967214 llvm-svn: 199942
-
Eric Christopher authored
code this looks correct, but could use review. The previous was definitely not correct. llvm-svn: 199940
-
Lang Hames authored
llvm-svn: 199938
-
Lang Hames authored
loops. Writing back to the accumulator (231-type) allows the coalescer to eliminate an extra copy. llvm-svn: 199933
-
Weiming Zhao authored
Originally, BLX was passed as operand #0 in MachineInstr and as operand #2 in MCInst. But now, it's operand #2 in both cases. This patch also removes unnecessary FileCheck in the test case added by r199127. llvm-svn: 199928
-
Juergen Ributzka authored
This patch adds the target analysis passes (usually TargetTransformInfo) to the codgen pipeline. We also expose now the AddAnalysisPasses method through the C API, because the optimizer passes would also benefit from better target-specific cost models. Reviewed by Andrew Kaylor llvm-svn: 199926
-
Ana Pazos authored
llvm-svn: 199925
-
Eric Christopher authored
void. Patch by Scott Talbot. llvm-svn: 199924
-
Tom Stellard authored
This fixes a crash in the OpenCV OpenCL test suite. There is no lit test for this, because the test would be very large and could easily be invalidated by changes to the scheduler or other parts of the compiler. Patch by: Vincent Lejeune llvm-svn: 199919
-
Tom Stellard authored
This pattern uses an SDNodeXForm, which isn't being emitted for some reason. I can get it to work by attaching the PatLeaf that has the XForm to the argument in the output pattern, but this results in an immediate being used in a register operand, which the backend can't handle yet. llvm-svn: 199918
-
Tom Stellard authored
The control flow finalizer would sometimes use an ALU_POP_AFTER instruction before the vetex fetch clause instead of using a POP instruction after it. llvm-svn: 199917
-
Tom Stellard authored
Implement the getUnrollingPreferences() function for AMDGPUTargetTransformInfo so that loops that do address calculations on pointers derived from alloca are unconditionally unrolled. Unrolling these loops makes it more likely that SROA will be able to eliminate the allocas, which is a big win for R600 since memory allocated by alloca (private memory) is really slow. llvm-svn: 199916
-
Rafael Espindola authored
Argument promotion can replace an argument of a call with an alloca. This requires clearing the tail marker as it is very likely that the callee is now using an alloca in the caller. This fixes pr14710. llvm-svn: 199909
-
Tom Stellard authored
The unit test is now disabled on non-asserts builds. The CF stack can be corrupted if you use CF_ALU_PUSH_BEFORE, CF_ALU_ELSE_AFTER, CF_ALU_BREAK, or CF_ALU_CONTINUE when the number of sub-entries on the stack is greater than or equal to the stack entry size and sub-entries modulo 4 is either 0 or 3 (on cedar the bug is present when number of sub-entries module 8 is either 7 or 0) We choose to be conservative and always apply the work-around when the number of sub-enries is greater than or equal to the stack entry size, so that we can safely over-allocate the stack when we are unsure of the stack allocation rules. reviewed-by: Vincent Lejeune <vljn at ovi.com> llvm-svn: 199905
-
Elena Demikhovsky authored
they give better sequences than VPERMI llvm-svn: 199893
-
Tim Northover authored
With constant-sharing, litpool loads consume 4 + N*2 bytes of code, but movw/movt pairs consume 8*N. This means litpools are better than movw/movt even with just one use. Other materialisation strategies can still be better though, so the logic is a little odd. llvm-svn: 199891
-
Artyom Skrobov authored
llvm-svn: 199886
-
Chandler Carruth authored
function and a FunctionPass. This has many benefits. The motivating use case was to be able to compute function analysis passes *after* running LoopSimplify (to avoid invalidating them) and then to run other passes which require LoopSimplify. Specifically passes like unrolling and vectorization are critical to wire up to BranchProbabilityInfo and BlockFrequencyInfo so that they can be profile aware. For the LoopVectorize pass the only things in the way are LoopSimplify and LCSSA. This fixes LoopSimplify and LCSSA is next on my list. There are also a bunch of other benefits of doing this: - It is now very feasible to make more passes *preserve* LoopSimplify because they can simply run it after changing a loop. Because subsequence passes can assume LoopSimplify is preserved we can reduce the runs of this pass to the times when we actually mutate a loop structure. - The new pass manager should be able to more easily support loop passes factored in this way. - We can at long, long last observe that LoopSimplify is preserved across SCEV. This *halves* the number of times we run LoopSimplify!!! Now, getting here wasn't trivial. First off, the interfaces used by LoopSimplify are all over the map regarding how analysis are updated. We end up with weird "pass" parameters as a consequence. I'll try to clean at least some of this up later -- I'll have to have it all clean for the new pass manager. Next up I discovered a really frustrating bug. LoopUnroll *claims* to preserve LoopSimplify. That's actually a lie. But the way the LoopPassManager ends up running the passes, it always ran LoopSimplify on the unrolled-into loop, rectifying this oversight before any verification could kick in and point out that in fact nothing was preserved. So I've added code to the unroller to *actually* simplify the surrounding loop when it succeeds at unrolling. The only functional change in the test suite is that we now catch a case that was previously missed because SCEV and other loop transforms see their containing loops as simplified and thus don't miss some opportunities. One test case has been converted to check that we catch this case rather than checking that we miss it but at least don't get the wrong answer. Note that I have #if-ed out all of the verification logic in LoopSimplify! This is a temporary workaround while extracting these bits from the LoopPassManager. Currently, there is no way to have a pass in the LoopPassManager which preserves LoopSimplify along with one which does not. The LPM will try to verify on each loop in the nest that LoopSimplify holds but the now-Function-pass cannot distinguish what loop is being verified and so must try to verify all of them. The inner most loop is clearly no longer simplified as there is a pass which didn't even *attempt* to preserve it. =/ Once I get LCSSA out (and maybe LoopVectorize and some other fixes) I'll be able to re-enable this check and catch any places where we are still failing to preserve LoopSimplify. If this causes problems I can back this out and try to commit *all* of this at once, but so far this seems to work and allow much more incremental progress. llvm-svn: 199884
-
Daniel Sanders authored
No functional change since the InstrItinData's have been duplicated. llvm-svn: 199876
-
Eric Christopher authored
e.g. linkonce, to TargetMachine and set it when we've done so for ELF targets currently. This involved making TargetMachine non-const in a TLOF use and propagating that change around - I'm open to other ideas. This will be used in a future commit to handle emitting debug information with ranges. llvm-svn: 199871
-
Kevin Qin authored
llvm-svn: 199858
-
NAKAMURA Takumi authored
llvm-svn: 199855
-
Jack Carter authored
llvm-svn: 199853
-
Jack Carter authored
This patch updates .set mips16 support which affects the ELF ABI and its flags. In addition the patch uses a common interface for both the MipsTargetSteamer and MipsObjectStreamer that the assembler uses for both ELF and ASCII output for these directives. llvm-svn: 199851
-
- Jan 22, 2014
-
-
Owen Anderson authored
Revert r162101 and replace it with a solution that works for targets where the pointer type is illegal. This is a horrible bit of code. We're calling a simplification routine *in the middle* of type legalization. We tell the simplification routine that it's running after legalization, but some of the types it will encounter will be illegal! The fix is only to invoke the simplification if the types in question were legal, so that none of its invariants will be violated. llvm-svn: 199847
-
Tom Stellard authored
This reverts commit 35b8331cad6eb512a2506adbc394201181da94ba. The -debug-only flag for llc doesn't appear to be available in all build configurations. llvm-svn: 199845
-
Rafael Espindola authored
Fixes pr18508. llvm-svn: 199843
-
Tom Stellard authored
The CF stack can be corrupted if you use CF_ALU_PUSH_BEFORE, CF_ALU_ELSE_AFTER, CF_ALU_BREAK, or CF_ALU_CONTINUE when the number of sub-entries on the stack is greater than or equal to the stack entry size and sub-entries modulo 4 is either 0 or 3 (on cedar the bug is present when number of sub-entries module 8 is either 7 or 0) We choose to be conservative and always apply the work-around when the number of sub-enries is greater than or equal to the stack entry size, so that we can safely over-allocate the stack when we are unsure of the stack allocation rules. reviewed-by: Vincent Lejeune <vljn at ovi.com> llvm-svn: 199842
-