- Jan 11, 2012
-
-
Chandler Carruth authored
strange build bot failures that look like a miscompile into an infloop. I'll investigate this tomorrow, but I'd both like to know whether my patch is the culprit, and get the bots back to green. llvm-svn: 147945
-
Chandler Carruth authored
lots of lines of code. No functionality changed. llvm-svn: 147942
-
Chandler Carruth authored
SRL-rooted code. llvm-svn: 147941
-
Chandler Carruth authored
factor the differences that were hiding in one of them into its other caller, the SRL handling code. No change in behavior. llvm-svn: 147940
-
Chandler Carruth authored
mask+shift pairs at the beginning of the ISD::AND case block, and then hoist the final pattern into a helper function, simplifying and reflowing it appropriately. This should have no observable behavior change, but several simplifications fell out of this such as directly computing the new mask constant, etc. llvm-svn: 147939
-
Jakob Stoklund Olesen authored
I don't think the compact encoding code is right, but at least is has defined behavior now. llvm-svn: 147938
-
Chandler Carruth authored
extracts and scaled addressing modes into its own helper function. No functionality changed here, just hoisting and layout fixes falling out of that hoisting. llvm-svn: 147937
-
Chandler Carruth authored
detect a pattern which can be implemented with a small 'shl' embedded in the addressing mode scale. This happens in real code as follows: unsigned x = my_accelerator_table[input >> 11]; Here we have some lookup table that we look into using the high bits of 'input'. Each entity in the table is 4-bytes, which means this implicitly gets turned into (once lowered out of a GEP): *(unsigned*)((char*)my_accelerator_table + ((input >> 11) << 2)); The shift right followed by a shift left is canonicalized to a smaller shift right and masking off the low bits. That hides the shift right which x86 has an addressing mode designed to support. We now detect masks of this form, and produce the longer shift right followed by the proper addressing mode. In addition to saving a (rather large) instruction, this also reduces stalls in Intel chips on benchmarks I've measured. In order for all of this to work, one part of the DAG needs to be canonicalized *still further* than it currently is. This involves removing pointless 'trunc' nodes between a zextload and a zext. Without that, we end up generating spurious masks and hiding the pattern. llvm-svn: 147936
-
Stepan Dyatkovskiy authored
1. Size heuristics changed. Now we calculate number of unswitching branches only once per loop. 2. Some checks was moved from UnswitchIfProfitable to processCurrentLoop, since it is not changed during processCurrentLoop iteration. It allows decide to skip some loops at an early stage. Extended statistics: - Added total number of instructions analyzed. llvm-svn: 147935
-
NAKAMURA Takumi authored
llvm-svn: 147928
-
NAKAMURA Takumi authored
llvm-svn: 147927
-
Andrew Trick authored
This interface is misleading and dangerous, but it is actually what we need for unrolling. llvm-svn: 147926
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 147924
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 147923
-
Andrew Trick authored
Allow LDRD to be formed from pairs with different LDR encodings. This was the original intention of the pass. Somewhere along the way, the LDR opcodes were refined which broke the optimization. We really don't care what the original opcodes are as long as they both map to the same LDRD and the immediate still fits. Fixes rdar://10435045 ARMLoadStoreOptimization cannot handle mixed LDRi8/LDRi12 llvm-svn: 147922
-
Jakob Stoklund Olesen authored
llvm-svn: 147921
-
Jakob Stoklund Olesen authored
Consider this code: int h() { int x; try { x = f(); g(); } catch (...) { return x+1; } return x; } The variable x is undefined on the first edge to the landing pad, but it has the f() return value on the second edge to the landing pad. SplitAnalysis::getLastSplitPoint() would assume that the return value from f() was live into the landing pad when f() throws, which is of course impossible. Detect these cases, and treat them as if the landing pad wasn't there. This allows spill code to be inserted after the function call to f(). <rdar://problem/10664933> llvm-svn: 147912
-
Jakob Stoklund Olesen authored
Delete the alternative implementation in LiveIntervalAnalysis. These functions computed the same thing, but SplitAnalysis caches the result. llvm-svn: 147911
-
Evan Cheng authored
the physical registers are not allocatable. llvm-svn: 147902
-
Bill Wendling authored
with other symbols. An object in the __cfstring section is suppoed to be filled with CFString objects, which have a pointer to ___CFConstantStringClassReference followed by a pointer to a __cstring. If we allow the object in the __cstring section to be merged with another global, then it could end up in any section. Because the linker is going to remove these symbols in the final executable, we shouldn't bother to merge them. <rdar://problem/10564621> llvm-svn: 147899
-
Eric Christopher authored
the comment. Fixes constvars.exp on the gdb test builder. llvm-svn: 147897
-
Chad Rosier authored
llvm-svn: 147891
-
- Jan 10, 2012
-
-
Lang Hames authored
llvm-svn: 147890
-
Joerg Sonnenberger authored
Add a test that checks the stack alignment of a simple function for Darwin, Linux and NetBSD for 32bit and 64bit mode. llvm-svn: 147888
-
Jakob Stoklund Olesen authored
This function runs after all constant islands have been placed, and may shrink some instructions to their 2-byte forms. This can actually cause some constant pool entries to move out of range because of growing alignment padding. Treat instructions that may be shrunk the same as inline asm - they erode the known alignment bits. Also reinstate an old assertion in verify(). It is correct now that basic block offsets include alignments. Add a single large test case that will hopefully exercise many parts of the constant island pass. <rdar://problem/10670199> llvm-svn: 147885
-
Evan Cheng authored
llvm-svn: 147884
-
Chad Rosier authored
failing test cases on our internal AVX nightly tester. rdar://10663637 llvm-svn: 147881
-
Devang Patel authored
llvm-svn: 147880
-
Kevin Enderby authored
functional change in r147860 to use DW_TAG_label's instead TAG_subprogram's. This only changes names and updates comments. No functional change. llvm-svn: 147877
-
Jim Grosbach authored
rdar://10663487 llvm-svn: 147876
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
llvm-svn: 147874
-
Chandler Carruth authored
Patch by Evgeniy Stepanov. llvm-svn: 147871
-
Richard Smith authored
llvm-svn: 147870
-
Bill Wendling authored
As the comment around 7746 says, it's better to use the x87 extended precision here than SSE. And the generic code doesn't know how to do that. It also regains the speed lost for the uint64_to_float.c testcase. <rdar://problem/10669858> llvm-svn: 147869
-
Richard Smith authored
llvm-svn: 147867
-
Chandler Carruth authored
conventions. Also, clarify the grouping of one of the asserts to silence -Wparentheses. llvm-svn: 147863
-
Chandler Carruth authored
of several newly un-defaulted switches. This also helps optimizers (including LLVM's) recognize that every case is covered, and we should assume as much. llvm-svn: 147861
-
Kevin Enderby authored
assembly source when it generates the TAG_subprogram dwarf debug info for the labels that have nothing between them as in this bit of assembly source: % cat ZeroLength.s _func1: _func2: nop One solution would be to not emit the subsequent labels with the same address and use the next label with a different address or the end of the section for the AT_high_pc value of the TAG_subprogram. Turns out in llvm-mc it is not possible in all cases to determine of two symbols have the same value at the point we put out the TAG_subprogram dwarf debug info. So we will have llvm-mc instead of putting out TAG_subprogram's put out DW_TAG_label's. And the DW_TAG_label does not have a AT_high_pc value which avoids the problem. This commit is only the functional change to make the diffs clear as to what is really being changed. The next commit will be to clean up the names of such things like MCGenDwarfSubprogramEntry to something like MCGenDwarfLabelEntry. rdar://10666925 llvm-svn: 147860
-
Devang Patel authored
Right now, this just adds additional entries in match table. The parser does not use them yet. llvm-svn: 147859
-
Devang Patel authored
llvm-svn: 147858
-