Skip to content
  1. Sep 06, 2009
  2. Sep 03, 2009
  3. Sep 02, 2009
  4. Aug 31, 2009
  5. Aug 29, 2009
  6. Aug 27, 2009
  7. Aug 22, 2009
  8. Aug 19, 2009
  9. Aug 18, 2009
  10. Aug 16, 2009
  11. Aug 15, 2009
  12. Aug 14, 2009
  13. Aug 13, 2009
  14. Aug 11, 2009
  15. Aug 10, 2009
  16. Aug 06, 2009
  17. Aug 05, 2009
    • Dan Gohman's avatar
      Major calling convention code refactoring. · f9bbcd1a
      Dan Gohman authored
      Instead of awkwardly encoding calling-convention information with ISD::CALL,
      ISD::FORMAL_ARGUMENTS, ISD::RET, and ISD::ARG_FLAGS nodes, TargetLowering
      provides three virtual functions for targets to override:
      LowerFormalArguments, LowerCall, and LowerRet, which replace the custom
      lowering done on the special nodes. They provide the same information, but
      in a more immediately usable format.
      
      This also reworks much of the target-independent tail call logic. The
      decision of whether or not to perform a tail call is now cleanly split
      between target-independent portions, and the target dependent portion
      in IsEligibleForTailCallOptimization.
      
      This also synchronizes all in-tree targets, to help enable future
      refactoring and feature work.
      
      llvm-svn: 78142
      f9bbcd1a
  18. Aug 03, 2009
  19. Aug 01, 2009
  20. Jul 31, 2009
  21. Jul 30, 2009
    • Dan Gohman's avatar
      Rename GRAD to GR32_AD, to follow the naming convention of other · 013f0077
      Dan Gohman authored
      classes. And define its SubRegClassList.
      
      llvm-svn: 77601
      013f0077
    • Evan Cheng's avatar
      Optimize some common usage patterns of atomic built-ins __sync_add_and_fetch()... · e62288fd
      Evan Cheng authored
      Optimize some common usage patterns of atomic built-ins __sync_add_and_fetch() and __sync_sub_and_fetch. 
      
      When the return value is not used (i.e. only care about the value in the memory), x86 does not have to use add to implement these. Instead, it can use add, sub, inc, dec instructions with the "lock" prefix.
      
      This is currently implemented using a bit of instruction selection trick. The issue is the target independent pattern produces one output and a chain and we want to map it into one that just output a chain. The current trick is to select it into a merge_values with the first definition being an implicit_def. The proper solution is to add new ISD opcodes for the no-output variant. DAG combiner can then transform the node before it gets to target node selection.
      
      Problem #2 is we are adding a whole bunch of x86 atomic instructions when in fact these instructions are identical to the non-lock versions. We need a way to add target specific information to target nodes and have this information carried over to machine instructions. Asm printer (or JIT) can use this information to add the "lock" prefix.
      
      llvm-svn: 77582
      e62288fd
Loading