- Mar 26, 2012
-
-
Douglas Gregor authored
llvm-svn: 153436
-
Anton Korobeynikov authored
Patch by Sylvestre Ledru! llvm-svn: 153435
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
llvm-svn: 153433
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
llvm-svn: 153432
-
Evgeniy Stepanov authored
It's not available on Android. We only use this header to find out if _DYNAMIC is present; declaring it "extern void*" does the trick. llvm-svn: 153431
-
Alexey Samsonov authored
llvm-svn: 153430
-
Craig Topper authored
llvm-svn: 153429
-
Eric Christopher authored
llvm-svn: 153428
-
Richard Smith authored
templated functions. Build a redeclaration chain, and only instantiate the definition of the enum when visiting the defining declaration. llvm-svn: 153427
-
Richard Smith authored
enumerations in templates until the template is instantiated. llvm-svn: 153426
-
Eric Christopher authored
--enable-libcpp to projects/sample. Patch by Dmitri Shubin with additional fixes by me. llvm-svn: 153425
-
Eric Christopher authored
Fixes PR12050 llvm-svn: 153424
-
Rafael Espindola authored
instruction simplify that lets us remove an and when loding a boolean value. llvm-svn: 153423
-
Craig Topper authored
llvm-svn: 153422
-
Craig Topper authored
llvm-svn: 153421
-
Aaron Ballman authored
Since this change is generating a considerable amount of discussion (and possibly even a regression for known bad versions), I'm reverting it. llvm-svn: 153420
-
- Mar 25, 2012
-
-
Chandler Carruth authored
constant-offsets of a common base using the generic GEP-walking logic I added for computing pointer differences in the same situation. llvm-svn: 153419
-
Chandler Carruth authored
inbounds GEPs. This isn't really necessary for simplifying pointer differences, but I'm planning to re-use the same code to simplify pointer comparisons where it is necessary. Since real code almost exclusively uses inbounds GEPs, it doesn't seem worth it to support the extra complexity of turning it on and off. If anyone would like that back, feel free to shout. Note that instcombine will still catch any of these patterns. llvm-svn: 153418
-
Eric Christopher authored
if it's there and we may not have a cached die yet. This fixes a bunch of false positives on "die has no decl". llvm-svn: 153417
-
Eric Christopher authored
llvm-svn: 153416
-
Craig Topper authored
llvm-svn: 153415
-
Craig Topper authored
llvm-svn: 153414
-
Aaron Ballman authored
Patch thanks to Nikola Smiljanic llvm-svn: 153413
-
Eli Bendersky authored
llvm-svn: 153412
-
Rafael Espindola authored
Thanks Duncan. llvm-svn: 153411
-
Chandler Carruth authored
aggressively. There are lots of dire warnings about this being expensive that seem to predate switching to the TrackingVH-based value remapper that is automatically updated on RAUW. This makes it easy to not just prune single-entry PHIs, but to fully simplify PHIs, and to recursively simplify the newly inlined code to propagate PHINode simplifications. This introduces a bit of a thorny problem though. We may end up simplifying a branch condition to a constant when we fold PHINodes, and we would like to nuke any dead blocks resulting from this so that time isn't wasted continually analyzing them, but this isn't easy. Deleting basic blocks *after* they are fully cloned and mapped into the new function currently requires manually updating the value map. The last piece of the simplification-during-inlining puzzle will require either switching to WeakVH mappings or some other piece of refactoring. I've left a FIXME in the testcase about this. llvm-svn: 153410
-
Eli Bendersky authored
a very (*very*) old version of Python (2.4?) llvm-svn: 153409
-
Eli Bendersky authored
* Removed test/lib/llvm.exp - it is no longer needed * Deleted the dg.exp reading code from test/lit.cfg. There are no dg.exp files left in the test suite so this code is no longer required. test/lit.cfg is now much shorter and clearer * Removed a lot of duplicate code in lit.local.cfg files that need access to the root configuration, by adding a "root" attribute to the TestingConfig object. This attribute is dynamically computed to provide the same information as was previously provided by the custom getRoot functions. * Documented the config.root attribute in docs/CommandGuide/lit.pod llvm-svn: 153408
-
NAKAMURA Takumi authored
llvm-svn: 153407
-
NAKAMURA Takumi authored
evaluateAsBooleanConditionNoCache(S) might update the map and invalidate the iterator. llvm-svn: 153406
-
Chandler Carruth authored
to instead rely on much more generic and powerful instruction simplification in the function cloner (and thus inliner). This teaches the pruning function cloner to use instsimplify rather than just the constant folder to fold values during cloning. This can simplify a large number of things that constant folding alone cannot begin to touch. For example, it will realize that 'or' and 'and' instructions with certain constant operands actually become constants regardless of what their other operand is. It also can thread back through the caller to perform simplifications that are only possible by looking up a few levels. In particular, GEPs and pointer testing tend to fold much more heavily with this change. This should (in some cases) have a positive impact on compile times with optimizations on because the inliner itself will simply avoid cloning a great deal of code. It already attempted to prune proven-dead code, but now it will be use the stronger simplifications to prove more code dead. llvm-svn: 153403
-
NAKAMURA Takumi authored
On msys bash, with %pathsep==os.pathsep==';', I can see lines like below in this script; env DIR=X:/foo%{pathsep}X:/bar Then it is expanded to; env DIR=X:/foo;X:/bar It should be with quote; env "DIR=X:/foo;X:/bar" llvm-svn: 153402
-
Chandler Carruth authored
fire if anything ever invalidates the assumption of a terminator instruction being unchanged throughout the routine. I've convinced myself that the current definition of simplification precludes such a transformation, so I think getting some asserts coverage that we don't violate this agreement is sufficient to make this code safe for the foreseeable future. Comments to the contrary or other suggestions are of course welcome. =] The bots are now happy with this code though, so it appears the bug here has indeed been fixed. llvm-svn: 153401
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 153400
-
Chandler Carruth authored
list. This is a bad idea. ;] I'm hopeful this is the bug that's showing up with the MSVC bots, but we'll see. It is definitely unnecessary. InstSimplify won't do anything to a terminator instruction, we don't need to even include it in the iteration range. We can also skip the now dead terminator check, although I've made it an assert to help document that this is an important invariant. I'm still a bit queasy about this because there is an implicit assumption that the terminator instruction cannot be RAUW'ed by the simplification code. While that appears to be true at the moment, I see no guarantee that would ensure it remains true in the future. I'm looking at the cleanest way to solve that... llvm-svn: 153399
-
- Mar 24, 2012
-
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 153398
-
Chandler Carruth authored
spotted by inspection, and I've crafted no test case that triggers it on my machine, but some of the windows builders are hitting what looks like memory corruption, so *something* is amiss here. This patch takes a more generalized approach to eliminating double-visits. Imagine code such as: %x = ... %y = add %x, 1 %z = add %x, %y You can imagine that if we simplify %x, we would add %y and %z to the list. If the use-chain order happens to cause us to add them in reverse order, we could pull %y off first, and simplify it, adding %z to the list. We now have %z on the list twice, and will reference it after it is deleted. Currently, all my test cases happen to not trigger this, likely due to the use-chain ordering, but there seems no guarantee that such a situation could not occur, so we should handle it correctly. Again, if anyone knows how to craft a testcase that actually triggers this, please let me know. llvm-svn: 153397
-
Chandler Carruth authored
worklist. This can happen in theory when an instruction uses itself, such as a PHI node. This was spotted by inspection, and unfortunately I've not been able to come up with a test case that would trigger it. If anyone has ideas, let me know... llvm-svn: 153396
-
Jean-Daniel Dupas authored
llvm-svn: 153395
-
Chandler Carruth authored
regressed seriously here, we are no longer removing allocas during inline cleanup. This appears to be because of lifetime markers "using" them. =/ I'll look into this shortly. llvm-svn: 153394
-