llvm-svn: 190813

Fast-isel generates a COPY_TO_REGCLASS for widening f32 to f64, which
is a nop on PPC64.  This is needed to keep the register class system
happy, but on the fast-isel path it is not removed before emit as it
is for DAG select.  Ignore this op when emitting instructions.

llvm-svn: 190795

We would have to compute the pre increment value, either by computing it on
every loop iteration or by splitting the edge out of the loop and inserting a
computation for it there.

For now, just give up vectorizing such loops.

Fixes PR17179.

llvm-svn: 190790

llvm-svn: 190782

llvm-svn: 190780

llvm-svn: 190779

The port originally had special patterns for extload, mapping them to the
same instructions as sextload.  It seemed neater to have patterns that
match "an extension that is allowed to be signed" and "an extension that
is allowed to be unsigned".

This was originally meant to be a clean-up, but it does improve the handling
of promoted integers a little, as shown by args-06.ll.

llvm-svn: 190777

llvm-svn: 190775

Previous discussion:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-July/063909.html

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1191

llvm-svn: 190773

This is a re-commit of r190764, with an extra check to make sure that we're not
performing the transformation on illegal types (a small test case has been
added for this as well).

Original commit message:

The PPC backend uses a target-specific DAG combine to turn unaligned Altivec
loads into a permutation-based sequence when possible. Unfortunately, the
target-specific DAG combine is not always called on all loads of interest
(sometimes the routines in DAGCombine call CombineTo such that the new node and
users are not added to the worklist); allowing the combine to trigger early
(before type legalization) mitigates this problem. Because the autovectorizers
only create legal vector types, I don't expect a lot of cases where this
optimization is enabled by type legalization in practice.

llvm-svn: 190771

llvm-svn: 190770

llvm-svn: 190769

Summary:
The '?' flag uses the last section group if the last had a section
group.  We treat combining an explicit section group and the '?' as a
hard error.

This fixes PR17198.

Reviewers: rafael, bkramer

Reviewed By: bkramer

CC: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1686

llvm-svn: 190768

For alignment purposes, the instruction array will always have an even
number of entries, with the final entry potentially unused (in which
case the array will be one longer than indicated by the count of unwind
codes field).

Reviewed by Anton Korobeynikov, Charles Davis and Nico Rieck.

llvm-svn: 190767

 data structures.

The Win64 EH data structures must be of type IMAGE_REL_AMD64_ADDR32NB
instead of IMAGE_REL_AMD64_ADDR32. This is easiely achieved by adding
the VK_COFF_IMGREL32 modifier to the symbol reference.
Change also references to start and end of the SEH range of a function
as offsets to start of the function.

Reviewed by Jim Grosbach, Charles Davis and Nico Rieck.

llvm-svn: 190766

This is causing test-suite failures.

Original commit message:

The PPC backend uses a target-specific DAG combine to turn unaligned Altivec
loads into a permutation-based sequence when possible. Unfortunately, the
target-specific DAG combine is not always called on all loads of interest
(sometimes the routines in DAGCombine call CombineTo such that the new node and
users are not added to the worklist); allowing the combine to trigger early
(before type legalization) mitigates this problem. Because the autovectorizers
only create legal vector types, I don't expect a lot of cases where this
optimization is enabled by type legalization in practice.

llvm-svn: 190765

The PPC backend uses a target-specific DAG combine to turn unaligned Altivec
loads into a permutation-based sequence when possible. Unfortunately, the
target-specific DAG combine is not always called on all loads of interest
(sometimes the routines in DAGCombine call CombineTo such that the new node and
users are not added to the worklist); allowing the combine to trigger early
(before type legalization) mitigates this problem. Because the autovectorizers
only create legal vector types, I don't expect a lot of cases where this
optimization is enabled by type legalization in practice.

llvm-svn: 190764

DAGCombiner::isAlias can be called with SrcValue1 or SrcValue2 null, and we
can't use AA in this case (if we try, then the casting code in AA will assert).

llvm-svn: 190763

so it can be better used for general interoperability testing between mips32
and mips16.

llvm-svn: 190762

llvm-svn: 190759

Also assembly/disassembly tests, and for sha256rnds2, aliases with an explicit
xmm0 dependency.

llvm-svn: 190754

llvm-svn: 190750

llvm-svn: 190749

This pass was based on the previous (essentially unused) profiling
infrastructure and the assumption that by ordering the basic blocks at
the IR level in a particular way, the correct layout would happen in the
end. This sometimes worked, and mostly didn't. It also was a really
naive implementation of the classical paper that dates from when branch
predictors were primarily directional and when loop structure wasn't
commonly available. It also didn't factor into the equation
non-fallthrough branches and other machine level details.

Anyways, for all of these reasons and more, I wrote
MachineBlockPlacement, which completely supercedes this pass. It both
uses modern profile information infrastructure, and actually works. =]

llvm-svn: 190748

llvm-svn: 190746

llvm-svn: 190745

llvm-svn: 190744

This was somewhat tricky because ~PrettyStackTraceEntry() may run after 
llvm_shutdown() has been called. This is rare and only happens for a common idiom 
used in the main() functions of command-line tools. This works around the idiom by 
skipping the stack clean-up if the PrettyStackTraceHead ManagedStatic is not 
constructed (i.e. llvm_shutdown() has been called).

llvm-svn: 190730

As it turns out, not a problem in practice, but it should be there.

llvm-svn: 190720

Implements Instruction scheduler latencies for Silvermont,
using latencies from the Intel Silvermont Optimization Guide.

Auto detects SLM.

Turns on post RA scheduler when generating code for SLM.

llvm-svn: 190717

By definition copies across register banks are not coalescable. Still, it may be
possible to get rid of such a copy when the value is available in another
register of the same register file.
Consider the following example, where capital and lower letters denote different
register file:
b = copy A <-- cross-bank copy
...
C = copy b <-- cross-bank copy

This could have been optimized this way:
b = copy A  <-- cross-bank copy
...
C = copy A <-- same-bank copy

Note: b and C's definitions may be in different basic blocks.

This patch adds a peephole optimization that looks through a chain of copies
leading to a cross-bank copy and reuses a source that is on the same register
file if available.

This solution could also be used to get rid of some copies (e.g., A could have
been used instead of C). However, we do not do so because:
- It may over constrain the coloring of the source register for coalescing.
- The register allocator may not be able to find a nice split point for the
  longer live-range, leading to more spill.

<rdar://problem/14742333>

llvm-svn: 190713

to be more consistent.

llvm-svn: 190692

Compiler part.

llvm-svn: 190689

Patch by Bradley Smith!

llvm-svn: 190683

llvm-svn: 190676

Just a clean-up, no behavioral change intended.

llvm-svn: 190673

E.g. "SRL %r2, 2; TMLL %r2, 1" => "TMLL %r2, 4".

llvm-svn: 190672

disabled.

llvm-svn: 190668

Previously we modelled VPR128 and VPR64 as essentially identical
register-classes containing V0-V31 (which had Q0-Q31 as "sub_alias"
sub-registers). This model is starting to cause significant problems
for code generation, particularly writing EXTRACT/INSERT_SUBREG
patterns for converting between the two.

The change here switches to classifying VPR64 & VPR128 as
RegisterOperands, which are essentially aliases for RegisterClasses
with different parsing and printing behaviour. This fits almost
exactly with their real status (VPR128 == FPR128 printed strangely,
VPR64 == FPR64 printed strangely).

llvm-svn: 190665

llvm-svn: 190659