missing-?:-true-value extension.

llvm-svn: 64505

etc.) when we perform name lookup on them. This ensures that we
produce the correct signature for these functions, which has two
practical impacts:

  1) When we're supporting the "implicit function declaration" feature
  of C99, these functions will be implicitly declared with the right
  signature rather than as a function returning "int" with no
  prototype. See PR3541 for the reason why this is important (hint:
  GCC always predeclares these functions).
 
  2) If users attempt to redeclare one of these library functions with
  an incompatible signature, we produce a hard error.

This patch does a little bit of work to give reasonable error
messages. For example, when we hit case #1 we complain that we're
implicitly declaring this function with a specific signature, and then
we give a note that asks the user to include the appropriate header
(e.g., "please include <stdlib.h> or explicitly declare 'malloc'"). In
case #2, we show the type of the implicit builtin that was incorrectly
declared, so the user can see the problem. We could do better here:
for example, when displaying this latter error message we say
something like:

  'strcpy' was implicitly declared here with type 'char *(char *, char
  const *)'

but we should really print out a fake code line showing the
declaration, like this:

  'strcpy' was implicitly declared here as:

    char *strcpy(char *, char const *)

This would also be good for printing built-in candidates with C++
operator overloading.

The set of C library functions supported by this patch includes all
functions from the C99 specification's <stdlib.h> and <string.h> that
(a) are predefined by GCC and (b) have signatures that could cause
codegen issues if they are treated as functions with no prototype
returning and int. Future work could extend this set of functions to
other C library functions that we know about.

llvm-svn: 64504

llvm-svn: 64502

llvm-svn: 64500

 - PR3566

llvm-svn: 64492

 - Fix emission of static functions with constructor attribute while I
   was here.
<rdar://problem/6140899> [codegen] "static" and attribute-constructor interact poorly

llvm-svn: 64488

for attribute used support.  
- No functionality change.

llvm-svn: 64487

llvm-svn: 64486

llvm-svn: 64482

llvm-svn: 64481

llvm-svn: 64479

llvm-svn: 64476

llvm-svn: 64475

llvm-svn: 64473

implementation with no category declaration!

llvm-svn: 64470

 - Now at 1274 passes on gcc compat suite vs 1262.

llvm-svn: 64469

llvm-svn: 64461

llvm-svn: 64459

llvm-svn: 64458

llvm-svn: 64457

llvm-svn: 64456

llvm-svn: 64455

llvm-svn: 64454

llvm-svn: 64452

llvm-svn: 64451

llvm-svn: 64445

Currently only used for 128-bit integers.

Note that we can't use the fixed-width integer types for other integer 
modes without other changes because glibc headers redefines (u)int*_t 
and friends using the mode attribute.  For example, this means that uint64_t
has to be compatible with unsigned __attribute((mode(DI))), and 
uint64_t is currently defined to long long.  And I have a feeling we'll 
run into issues if we try to define uint64_t as something which isn't 
either long or long long.

This doesn't get the alignment right in most cases, including 
the 128-bit integer case; I'll file a PR shortly.  The gist of the issue 
is that the targets don't really expose the information necessary to 
figure out the alignment outside of the target description, so there's a 
non-trivial amount of work involved in getting it working right.  That 
said, the alignment used is conservative, so the only issue with the 
current implementation is ABI compatibility.

This makes it trivial to add some sort of "bitwidth" attribute to make 
arbitrary-width integers; I'll do that in a followup.

We could also use this for stuff like the following for compatibility 
with gcc, but I have a feeling it would be a better idea for clang to be 
consistent between C and C++ modes rather than follow gcc's example for 
C mode.
struct {unsigned long long x : 33;} x;
unsigned long long a(void) {return x.x+1;}

llvm-svn: 64434

llvm-svn: 64425

ABI to the CodeGen library. Since C++ code-generation is so
incomplete, we can't exercise much of this mangling code. However, a
few smoke tests show that it's doing the same thing as GCC. When C++
codegen matures, we'll extend the ABI tester to verify name-mangling
as well, and complete the implementation here.

At this point, the major client of name mangling is in the uses of the
new "overloadable" attribute in C, which allows overloading. Any
"overloadable" function in C (or in an extern "C" block in C++) will
be mangled the same way that the corresponding C++ function would be
mangled.

llvm-svn: 64413

llvm-svn: 64411

to a base class (nonfragile abi ir gen bug).

llvm-svn: 64391

tried to put FIXMEs on the most important things to fix up.  Lots left
to do including more codegen, more documentation and cleaning code and
style cleanups.

llvm-svn: 64390

llvm-svn: 64387

- rename isObjCIdType/isObjCClassType -> isObjCIdStructType/isObjCClassStructType. The previous name didn't do what you would expect.
- add back isObjCIdType/isObjCClassType to do what you would expect. Not currently used, however many of the isObjCIdStructType/isObjCClassStructType clients could be converted over time.
- move static Sema function areComparableObjCInterfaces to ASTContext (renamed to areComparableObjCPointerTypes, since it now operates on pointer types).

llvm-svn: 64385

llvm-svn: 64380

 - Doesn't yet handle case where values are passed in mixed (general
   purpose & floating point) registers; otherwise largely
   functional. Code still needs some cleaning.

Fixes:
MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua
MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod
MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs
SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-03-02-VaCopy

gcc compat test suite results (Darwin x86-32 & -64):
--
# of expected passes		1262
# of unexpected failures	56
# of unresolved testcases	34
# of unsupported tests		2

Compare to: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090209/012050.html

llvm-svn: 64370

llvm-svn: 64346

case on x86_64.

llvm-svn: 64333

llvm-svn: 64325

llvm-svn: 64323