[LLDB] Fix handling of bit-fields when there is a base class when parsing DWARF

When parsing DWARF and laying out bit-fields we currently don't take into account whether we have a base class or not.
Currently if the first field is a bit-field but the bit offset is due a field we inherit from a base class we currently
treat it as an unnamed bit-field and therefore add an extra field.

This fix will not check if we have a base class and assume that this offset is due to members we are inheriting from the base.
We are currently seeing asserts during codegen when debugging clang::DiagnosticOptions.

This assumption will fail in the case where the first field in the derived class in an unnamed bit-field. Fixing the first field
being an unnamed bit-field looks like it will require a larger change since we will need a way to track or discover the last field offset of the bases(s).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76808