[CostModel] remove cost-kind predicate for vector reduction costs

This is similar in spirit to 01ea93d8 (memcpy) except that
here the underlying caller assumptions were created for vectorizer
use (throughput) rather than other passes.

That meant targets could have an enormous throughput cost with no
corresponding size, latency, or blended cost increase.
The ARM costs show a small difference between throughput and
size because there's an underlying difference in cmp/sel
costs that is also predicated on cost-kind.

Paraphrasing from the previous commits:
This may not make sense for some callers, but at least now the
costs will be consistently wrong instead of mysteriously wrong.

Targets should provide better overrides if the current modeling
is not accurate.