Skip to content
Commit 343e204a authored by John Brawn's avatar John Brawn
Browse files

[ARM] Replace TransferImpOps with copyImplicitOps

In most places where TransferImpOps is currently used we just have one
machine instruction, so it's doing the same thing as copyImplicitOps
anyway. In those cases where we have more than one machine
instruction the destination is written to in each instruction so any
implicit defs should appear on all of them (and we shouldn't see any
implicit refs as these pseudo-instruction don't have any register
inputs), meaning the current use of TransferImpOps is incorrect and
we should be using copyImplicitOps on all of the generated
instructions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155301
parent 46aec7bc
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment