Fix for r364686 - actually set symbol_is_missing_weak...
This was set in a std::function, but I was shadowing a variable that I thought I was capturing. Even with this bug we were correctly not raising an error and returning an address of 0x0. We were not marking the symbol as weak, but apparently the JIT didn't need that, so the test still passed. llvm-svn: 364980
Loading
Please sign in to comment