[ValueTracking] Use ConstantRange based overflow check for signed sub
This is D59450, but for signed sub. This case is not NFC, because the overflow logic in ConstantRange is more powerful than the existing check. This resolves the TODO in the function. I've added two tests to show that this indeed catches more cases than the previous logic, but the main correctness test coverage here is in the existing ConstantRange unit tests. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59617 llvm-svn: 356685
Loading
Please sign in to comment