Skip to content
Commit 40425183 authored by Sam Parker's avatar Sam Parker
Browse files

[ARM][MVE] Tail predicate in the presence of vcmp

Record the discovered VPT blocks while checking for validity and, for
now, only handle blocks that begin with VPST and not VPT. We're now
allowing more than one instruction to define vpr, but each block must
somehow be predicated using the vctp. This leaves us with several
scenarios which need fixing up:
1) A VPT block with is only predicated by the vctp and has no
   internal vpr defs.
2) A VPT block which is only predicated by the vctp but has an
   internal vpr def.
3) A VPT block which is predicated upon the vctp as well as another
   vpr def.
4) A VPT block which is not predicated upon a vctp, but contains it
   and all instructions within the block are predicated upon in.

The changes needed are, for:
1) The easy one, just remove the vpst and unpredicate the
   instructions in the block.
2) Remove the vpst and unpredicate the instructions up to the
   internal vpr def. Need insert a new vpst to predicate the
   remaining instructions.
3) No nothing.
4) The vctp will be inside a vpt and the instruction will be removed,
   so adjust the size of the mask on the vpst.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71107
parent 4f0fe6b9
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment