[SLP] further limit bailout for load combine candidate (PR47450)
The test example based on PR47450 shows that we can match non-byte-sized shifts, but those won't ever be bswap opportunities. This isn't a full fix (we'd still match if the shifts were by 8-bits for example), but this should be enough until there's evidence that we need to do more (this is a borderline case for vectorization in the first place).
Loading
Please sign in to comment