Skip to content
Commit 42e5f1d9 authored by River Riddle's avatar River Riddle
Browse files

[mlir] Refactor how additional verification is specified in ODS

Currently if an operation requires additional verification, it specifies an inline
code block (`let verifier = "blah"`). This is quite problematic for various reasons, e.g.
it requires defining C++ inside of Tablegen which is discouraged when possible, but mainly because
nearly all usages simply forward to a static function `static LogicalResult verify(SomeOp op)`.
This commit adds support for a `hasVerifier` bit field that specifies if an additional verifier
is needed, and when set to `1` declares a `LogicalResult verify()` method for operations to
override. For migration purposes, the existing behavior is untouched. Upstream usages will
be replaced in a followup to keep this patch focused on the hasVerifier implementation.

One main user facing change is that what was one `MyOp::verify` is now `MyOp::verifyInvariants`.
This better matches the name this method is called everywhere else, and also frees up `verify` for
the user defined additional verification. The `verify` function when generated now (for additional
verification) is private to the operation class, which should also help avoid accidental usages after
this switch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118742
parent 7e9d1901
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment