Skip to content
Commit 4c892770 authored by Fangrui Song's avatar Fangrui Song
Browse files

[Mips][MC] AttemptToFoldSymbolOffsetDifference: revert isMicroMips special case

D52985/D57677 added a .gcc_except_table workaround, but the new behavior
doesn't match GNU assembler.
```
void foo();
int bar() {
  foo();
  try { throw 1; }
  catch (int) { return 1; }
  return 0;
}

clang --target=mipsel-linux-gnu -mmicromips -S a.cc
mipsel-linux-gnu-gcc -mmicromips -c a.s -o gnu.o

.uleb128 ($cst_end0)-($cst_begin0)     // bit 0 is not forced to 1
.uleb128 ($func_begin0)-($func_begin0) // bit 0 is not forced to 1
```

I have inspected `.gcc_except_table` output by `mipsel-linux-gnu-gcc -mmicromips -c a.cc`.
The `.uleb128` values are not forced to set the least significant bit.

In addition, D57677's adjustment (even->odd) to CodeGen/Mips/micromips-b-range.ll is wrong.
PC-relative `.long func - .` values will differ from GNU assembler as well.

The original intention of D52985 seems unclear to me. I think whatever
goal it wants to achieve should be moved to an upper layer.

This isMicroMips special case has caused problems to fix MCAssembler::relaxLEB to use evaluateAsAbsolute instead of evaluateKnownAbsolute,
which is needed to proper support R_RISCV_SET_ULEB128/R_RISCV_SUB_ULEB128.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157655
parent 235dad33
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment