[InstCombine] check one-use before applying DeMorgan nor/nand folds

If we have ~(~X & Y), it only makes sense to transform it to (X | ~Y) when we do not need 
the intermediate (~X & Y) value. In that case, we would need an extra instruction to 
generate ~Y + 'or' (as shown in the test changes).

It's ok if we have multiple uses of ~X or Y, however. In those cases, we may not reduce the
instruction count or critical path, but we might improve throughput because we can generate 
~X and ~Y in parallel. Whether that actually makes perf sense or not for a target is something 
we can't answer in IR.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32703

llvm-svn: 301848