[TestStaticVariables] Mark the one unmarked test let also expectedFailure.
Summary: The test is question here is already annotated with @expectedFailureDarwin(9980907). This change also removes an uneccessary (and probably wrong) logic of byssing few asserts if the compiler is not clang or llvm-gcc. Both GCC and Clang emit incomplete debug info. Clang emits this: < 1><0x00000026> DW_TAG_class_type DW_AT_name "A" DW_AT_byte_size 0x00000001 DW_AT_decl_file 0x00000001 DW_AT_decl_line 0x0000001b < 2><0x0000002e> DW_TAG_member DW_AT_name "g_points" DW_AT_type <0x0000003b> DW_AT_decl_file 0x00000001 DW_AT_decl_line 0x0000001e DW_AT_external yes(1) DW_AT_declaration yes(1) DW_AT_accessibility DW_ACCESS_public < 1><0x0000003b> DW_TAG_array_type DW_AT_type <0x00000046> < 2><0x00000040> DW_TAG_subrange_type DW_AT_type <0x0000007b> Notice that the DIE at 0x40 does not specify an upperbound. This is with Clang-3.5 and Clang ToT. GCC emits this: < 1><0x000000aa> DW_TAG_class_type DW_AT_name "A" DW_AT_byte_size 0x00000001 DW_AT_decl_file 0x00000001 DW_AT_decl_line 0x0000001b DW_AT_sibling <0x000000c1> < 2><0x000000b4> DW_TAG_member DW_AT_name "g_points" DW_AT_decl_file 0x00000001 DW_AT_decl_line 0x0000001e DW_AT_type <0x000000c1> DW_AT_external yes(1) DW_AT_accessibility DW_ACCESS_public DW_AT_declaration yes(1) < 1><0x000000c1> DW_TAG_array_type DW_AT_type <0x0000007e> DW_AT_sibling <0x000000cc> < 2><0x000000ca> DW_TAG_subrange_type The DIE at 0xca is missing attributes. This is with gcc-4.8.2. Test Plan: dotest.py -C clang -P TestStaticVariables.py Reviewers: clayborg Reviewed By: clayborg Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6713 llvm-svn: 224643
Loading
Please sign in to comment