[X86] Prefer VPERMQ over VPERM2F128 for any unary shuffle, not just the ones...
[X86] Prefer VPERMQ over VPERM2F128 for any unary shuffle, not just the ones that can be done with a insertf128 The early out for AVX2 in lowerV2X128VectorShuffle is positioned in a weird spot below some shuffle mask equivalency checks. But I think we want to allow VPERMQ for any unary shuffle. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37893 llvm-svn: 313373
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment