Add a feature where a string data formatter can now be partially composed of...
Add a feature where a string data formatter can now be partially composed of Python summary functions This works similarly to the {thread/frame/process/target.script:...} feature - you write a summary string, part of which is ${var.script:someFuncName} someFuncName is expected to be declared as def someFuncName(SBValue,otherArgument) - essentially the same as a summary function Since . -> [] are the only allowed separators, and % is used for custom formatting, .script: would not be a legitimate symbol anyway, which makes this non-ambiguous llvm-svn: 220821
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment