[CodeGen/AccelTable]: Don't emit accelerator entries for functions with no names

Summary:
We were emitting accelerator entries for functions with no name, which
is contrary to the DWARF v5 spec: "All other (i.e., *not*
DW_TAG_namespace) debugging information entries without a DW_AT_name
attribute are excluded." Besides that, a name table entry with an empty
string as a key is fairly useless.

We can sometimes end up with functions which have a DW_AT_linkage_name but no
DW_AT_name. One such example is the global-constructor-initialization functions,
which C++ compilers synthesize for each compilation unit with global
constructors.
A very strict reading of the DWARF v5 spec would suggest that we should not even
emit the accelerator entry for the linkage name in this case, but I don't think
we should go that far.

I found this when running the dwarf verifier over llvm codebase compiled
with DWARF v5 accelerator tables.

Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie

Subscribers: vleschuk, clayborg, echristo, probinson, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45367

llvm-svn: 329552