[LoopDelete][Assume] Allow deleting loops with assumes
This pervent very poor optimization caused by a signle assume like https://godbolt.org/z/EK3oMh baseline flags: -O3 patched flags: -O3 -mllvm --enable-knowledge-retention Before the patch ``` Metric: compile_time Program baseline patched diff test-suite :: CTMark/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4.test 20.72 29.74 43.5% test-suite :: CTMark/Bullet/bullet.test 24.39 24.91 2.2% test-suite :: CTMark/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 37.39 38.06 1.8% test-suite :: CTMark/kimwitu++/kc.test 11.76 11.94 1.5% test-suite :: CTMark/sqlite3/sqlite3.test 12.94 12.91 -0.3% test-suite :: CTMark/SPASS/SPASS.test 11.72 11.70 -0.2% test-suite :: CTMark/lencod/lencod.test 16.12 16.10 -0.1% test-suite :: CTMark/ClamAV/clamscan.test 13.31 13.30 -0.1% test-suite :: CTMark/mafft/pairlocalalign.test 9.12 9.12 -0.1% test-suite :: CTMark/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset.test 9.34 9.34 -0.1% Geomean difference 4.2% Metric: compiler_Kinst_count Program baseline patched diff test-suite :: CTMark/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4.test 107576069.87 172886418.90 60.7% test-suite :: CTMark/Bullet/bullet.test 123291865.66 125457117.96 1.8% test-suite :: CTMark/kimwitu++/kc.test 56347884.64 57298544.14 1.7% test-suite :: CTMark/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 180637699.58 183341656.57 1.5% test-suite :: CTMark/sqlite3/sqlite3.test 66723788.85 66664692.80 -0.1% test-suite :: CTMark/ClamAV/clamscan.test 69581500.56 69597863.92 0.0% test-suite :: CTMark/lencod/lencod.test 94236501.48 94216545.32 -0.0% test-suite :: CTMark/SPASS/SPASS.test 58516756.95 58505089.07 -0.0% test-suite :: CTMark/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset.test 48832815.53 48841989.39 0.0% test-suite :: CTMark/mafft/pairlocalalign.test 49682720.53 49686324.34 0.0% Geomean difference 5.4% ``` After the patch ``` Metric: compile_time Program baseline patched diff test-suite :: CTMark/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4.test 20.70 22.40 8.2% test-suite :: CTMark/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 37.13 38.05 2.5% test-suite :: CTMark/Bullet/bullet.test 24.25 24.83 2.4% test-suite :: CTMark/kimwitu++/kc.test 11.69 11.94 2.2% test-suite :: CTMark/ClamAV/clamscan.test 13.19 13.36 1.3% test-suite :: CTMark/lencod/lencod.test 16.02 16.19 1.1% test-suite :: CTMark/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset.test 9.29 9.36 0.7% test-suite :: CTMark/SPASS/SPASS.test 11.64 11.73 0.7% test-suite :: CTMark/mafft/pairlocalalign.test 9.10 9.15 0.5% test-suite :: CTMark/sqlite3/sqlite3.test 12.95 12.96 0.0% Geomean difference 1.9% Metric: compiler_Kinst_count Program baseline patched diff test-suite :: CTMark/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4.test 107590933.61 114044834.72 6.0% test-suite :: CTMark/kimwitu++/kc.test 56344526.77 57235806.29 1.6% test-suite :: CTMark/Bullet/bullet.test 123291285.10 125128334.97 1.5% test-suite :: CTMark/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 180641540.10 183155706.39 1.4% test-suite :: CTMark/sqlite3/sqlite3.test 66725619.22 66668713.92 -0.1% test-suite :: CTMark/SPASS/SPASS.test 58509029.85 58478704.75 -0.1% test-suite :: CTMark/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset.test 48843711.23 48826894.68 -0.0% test-suite :: CTMark/lencod/lencod.test 94233305.79 94207544.23 -0.0% test-suite :: CTMark/ClamAV/clamscan.test 69587887.66 69603549.90 0.0% test-suite :: CTMark/mafft/pairlocalalign.test 49686968.65 49689291.04 0.0% Geomean difference 1.0% ``` Reviewed By: jdoerfert, efriedma Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86816
Loading
Please sign in to comment