Skip to content
Commit 9f019835 authored by James Molloy's avatar James Molloy
Browse files

[Thumb] Reapply r272251 with a fix for PR28348

We were using DAG->getConstant instead of DAG->getTargetConstant. This meant that we could inadvertently increase the use count of a constant if stars aligned, which it did in this testcase. Increasing the use count of the constant could cause ISel to fall over (because DAGToDAG lowering assumed the constant had only one use!)

Original commit message:
  [Thumb] Select a BIC instead of AND if the immediate can be encoded more optimally negated

  If an immediate is only used in an AND node, it is possible that the immediate can be more optimally materialized when negated. If this is the case, we can negate the immediate and use a BIC instead;

    int i(int a) {
      return a & 0xfffffeec;
    }

  Used to produce:
      ldr r1, [CONSTPOOL]
      ands r0, r1
    CONSTPOOL: 0xfffffeec

  And now produces:
      movs    r1, #255
      adds    r1, #20  ; Less costly immediate generation
      bics    r0, r1

llvm-svn: 274510
parent 7f8d6dc0
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment