Correctly handle zero-sized but non-empty base classes in IRGen.
Fixes rdar://20621065. A more elegant fix would preclude this case by defining the rules such that zero-size classes are always formally empty. I believe the only extensions which create zero-size classes right now are flexible arrays and zero-length arrays; it's not abstractly unreasonable to say that those don't count as members for the purposes of emptiness, just as zero-width bitfields don't count. But that's an ABI-affecting change and requires further discussion; in the meantime, let's not assert / miscompile. llvm-svn: 235815
Loading
Please sign in to comment