[clangd] Rename Module -> FeatureModule to avoid confusion. NFC
As pointed out in D96244, "Module" is already pretty overloaded to refer to clang and llvm modules. (And clangd deals directly with the former). FeatureModule is a bit of a mouthful but it's pretty self-descriptive. I think it might be better than "Component" which doesn't really capture the "common interface" aspect - it's IMO confusing to refer to "components" but exclude CDB for example. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97950
Loading
Please sign in to comment