[CGP] Ensure sinking multiple instructions does not invalidate dominance checks

In MVE, as of rL371218, we are attempting to sink chains of instructions such as:
  %l1 = insertelement <8 x i8> undef, i8 %l0, i32 0
  %broadcast.splat26 = shufflevector <8 x i8> %l1, <8 x i8> undef, <8 x i32> zeroinitializer
In certain situations though, we can end up breaking the dominance relations of
instructions. This happens when we sink the instruction into a loop, but cannot
remove the originals. The Use is updated, which might in fact be a Use from the
second instruction to the first.

This attempts to fix that by reversing the order of instruction that are sunk,
and ensuring that we update the uses on new instructions if they have already
been sunk, not the old ones.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67366

llvm-svn: 371743