PR45083: Mark statement expressions as being dependent if they contain
dependent constructs. We previously assumed they were neither value- nor instantiation-dependent under any circumstances, which would lead to crashes and other misbehavior. This doesn't match GCC's behavior (where statement expressions appear to be treated as value-dependent if they appear in a dependent context), but seems to be the best thing we can do in the short term: it turns out to be remarkably difficult for us to correctly determine whether we are in a dependent context (and it's not even possible in some cases, such as in a generic lambda where we might not have seen the 'auto' yet).
Loading
Please sign in to comment