[SLP] Don't vectorize stores of non-packed types (like i1, i2)
In the spirit of commit fc783e91 (llvm-svn: 248943) we shouldn't vectorize stores of non-packed types (i.e. types that has padding between consecutive variables in a scalar layout, but being packed in a vector layout). The problem was detected as a miscompile in a downstream test case. Reviewed By: anton-afanasyev Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94446
Loading
Please sign in to comment