Bugfix: SCEVExpander incorrectly marks increment operations as no-wrap

    
(The change was landed in r230280 and caused the regression PR22674.
This version contains a fix and a test-case for PR22674).
    
When emitting the increment operation, SCEVExpander marks the
operation as nuw or nsw based on the flags on the preincrement SCEV.
This is incorrect because, for instance, it is possible that {-6,+,1}
is <nuw> while {-6,+,1}+1 = {-5,+,1} is not.
    
This change teaches SCEV to mark the increment as nuw/nsw only if it
can explicitly prove that the increment operation won't overflow.
    
Apart from the attached test case, another (more realistic)
manifestation of the bug can be seen in
Transforms/IndVarSimplify/pr20680.ll.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7778

llvm-svn: 230533