Skip to content
Commit e4d1d0cc authored by Nikita Popov's avatar Nikita Popov
Browse files

[SCEV] Fix isImpliedViaMerge() with values from previous iteration (PR56242)

When trying to prove an implied condition on a phi by proving it
for all incoming values, we need to be careful about values coming
from a backedge, as these may refer to a previous loop iteration.
A variant of this issue was fixed in D101829, but the dominance
condition used there isn't quite right: It checks that the value
dominates the incoming block, which doesn't exclude backedges
(values defined in a loop will usually dominate the loop latch,
which is the incoming block of the backedge).

Instead, we should be checking for domination of the phi block.
Any values defined inside the loop will not dominate the loop
header phi.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56242.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128640
parent 6e2058e5
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment