[PowerPC] Try harder to find a base+offset when looking for consecutive accesses

When forming permutation-based unaligned vector loads, we need to know whether
it is valid to read ahead of the requested address by a full vector length.
Doing so is more efficient (and allows for more CSE with later loads), but
could trigger a page fault if invalid. To determine validity, we look for other
loads in the same block that access the relevant address range.

The relevant point here is that we need to do this as part of the process of
forming permutation-based vector loads, and this happens quite early in the
SDAG pipeline - specifically before many of the address calculations are fully
canonicalized. As a result, we need to try harder to recognize base+offset
address computations, because they still might appear as chain of adds
(base+offset+offset, for example). To account for this, we'll look through
chains of adds, accumulating the constant offsets.

llvm-svn: 246813