Skip to content
Commit e73b20c5 authored by Sam Parker's avatar Sam Parker
Browse files

[ARM][MVE] Disallow VPSEL for tail predication

Due to the current way that we collect predicated instructions, we
can't easily handle vpsel in tail predicated loops. There are a
couple of issues:
1) It will use the VPR as a predicate operand, but doesn't have to be
   instead a VPT block, which means we can assert while building up
   the VPT block because we don't find another VPST to being a new
   one.
2) VPSEL still requires a VPR operand even after tail predicating,
   which means we can't remove it unless there is another
   instruction, such as vcmp, that can provide the VPR def.

The first issue should be a relatively simple fix in the logic of the
LowOverheadLoops pass, whereas the second will require us to
represent the 'implicit' tail predication with an explicit value.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72629
parent d6ea8ff0
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment