[lld-macho] Fix handling of X86_64_RELOC_SIGNED_{1,2,4}

The previous implementation miscalculated the addend, resulting
in an underflow. This meant that every SIGNED_N section relocation would
be associated with the last subsection (since the addend would now be a
huge number). We were "lucky" that this mistake was typically cancelled
out -- 64-to-32-bit-truncation meant that the final value was correct,
as long as subsections were not rearranged.

Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98385