[InstrProf] Encode linkage names in IRPGO counter names

Prior to this diff, names in the `__llvm_prf_names` section had the format `[<filepath>:]<function-name>`, e.g., `main.cpp:foo`, `bar`. `<filepath>` is used to discriminate between possibly identical function names when linkage is local and `<function-name>` simply comes from `F.getName()`. This has two problems:
  * `:` is commonly found in Objective-C functions so that names like `main.mm:-[C foo::]` and `-[C bar::]` are difficult to parse
  * `<function-name>` might be different from the linkage name, so it cannot be used to pass a function order to the linker via `-symbol-ordering-file` or `-order_file` (see https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-temporal-profiling-extension-for-irpgo/68068)

Instead, this diff changes the format to `[<filepath>;]<linkage-name>`, e.g., `main.cpp;_foo`, `_bar`. The hope is that `;` won't realistically be found in either `<filepath>` or `<linkage-name>`.

To prevent invalidating all prior IRPGO profiles, we also lookup the prior name format when a record is not found (see `InstrProfSymtab::create()`, `readMemprof()`, and `getInstrProfRecord()`). It seems that Swift and Clang FE-PGO rely on the original `getPGOFuncName()`, so we cannot simply replace it.

Reviewed By: MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156569