- Jul 20, 2016
-
-
Renato Golin authored
Lots of blocks had "llvm" or "nasm" syntax types but either weren't following the syntax, or the syntax has changed (and sphinx hasn't keep up) or the type doesn't even exist (nasm?). Other documents had :options: what were invalid. I only removed those that had warnings, and left the ones that didn't, in order to follow the principle of least surprise. This is like this for ages, but the buildbot is now failing on errors. It may take a while to upgrade the buildbot's sphinx, if that's even possible, but that shouldn't stop us from getting docs updates (which seem down for quite a while). Also, we're not losing any syntax highlight, since when it doesn't parse, it doesn't colour. Ie. those blocks are not being highlighted anyway. I'm trying to get all docs in one go, so that it's easy to revert later if we do fix, or at least easy to know what's to fix. llvm-svn: 276109
-
- Mar 04, 2015
-
-
David Blaikie authored
Here's a rough/first draft - it at least hits the actual textual IR examples and some of the phrasing. It's probably worth a full pass over, but I'm not sure how much these docs should reflect the strange intermediate state we're in anyway. Totally open to lots of review/feedback/suggestions. llvm-svn: 231294
-
- Feb 19, 2014
-
-
Sean Silva authored
Some references to llvm-gcc were so crusty that I wasn't sure how to proceed and so I've left them intact. I also slipped in a quick peephole fix to use a :doc: link instead of raw HTML link. llvm-svn: 201619
-
- Jan 11, 2013
-
-
Sean Silva authored
Before we learned about :doc:, we used :ref: and put a dummy link at the top of each page. Don't do that anymore. This fixes PR14891 as a special case. llvm-svn: 172162
-
- Dec 06, 2012
-
-
Dmitri Gribenko authored
llvm-svn: 169546
-
- Jun 20, 2012
-
-
Bill Wendling authored
llvm-svn: 158858
-