Test was modified in r279670

llvm-svn: 279690

The cost of predicating a diamond is only the instructions that are not shared
between the two branches. Additionally If a predicate clobbering instruction
occurs in the shared portion of the branches (e.g. a cond move), it may still
be possible to if convert the sub-cfg. This change handles these two facts by
rescanning the non-shared portion of a diamond sub-cfg to recalculate both the
predication cost and whether both blocks are pred-clobbering.

Fixed 2 bugs before recommitting. Branch instructions must be compared and found
identical before diamond conversion. Also, predicate-clobbering instructions in
the shared prefix disqualifies a potential diamond conversion. Includes tests
for both.

llvm-svn: 279670

The C and C++ semantics for compare_exchange require it to return a bool
indicating success. This gets mapped to LLVM IR which follows each cmpxchg with
an icmp of the value loaded against the desired value.

When lowered to ldxr/stxr loops, this extra comparison is redundant: its
results are implicit in the control-flow of the function.

This commit makes two changes: it replaces that icmp with appropriate PHI
nodes, and then makes sure earlyCSE is called after expansion to actually make
use of the opportunities revealed.

I've also added -{arm,aarch64}-enable-atomic-tidy options, so that
existing fragile tests aren't perturbed too much by the change. Many
of them either rely on undef/unreachable too pervasively to be
restored to something well-defined (particularly while making sure
they test the same obscure assert from many years ago), or depend on a
particular CFG shape, which is disrupted by SimplifyCFG.

rdar://problem/16227836

llvm-svn: 209883

indirect branches correctly. Under some circumstances, this led to the deletion
of basic blocks that were the destination of indirect branches. In that case it
left indirect branches to nowhere in the code.

This patch replaces, and is more general than either of the previous fixes for
indirect-branch-analysis issues, r181161 and r186461.

For other branches (not indirect) this refactor should have *almost* identical
behavior to the previous version. There are some corner cases where this
refactor is able to analyze blocks that the previous version could not (e.g.
this necessitated the update to thumb2-ifcvt2.ll). 

<rdar://problem/14464830>

llvm-svn: 186735