This tool merges interface stub files to produce a merged interface stub file
or a stub library. Currently it for stub library generation it can produce an
ELF .so stub file, or a TBD file (experimental). It will be used by the clang
-emit-interface-stubs compilation pipeline to merge and assemble the per-CU
stub files into a stub library.

The new IFS format is as follows:

--- !experimental-ifs-v1
IfsVersion:      1.0
Triple:          <llvm triple>
ObjectFileFormat: <ELF | TBD>
Symbols:
  _ZSymbolName: { Type: <type>, etc... }
...

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66405

llvm-svn: 370499

SDLoc(N0) and SDLoc(cast<LoadSDNode>(N0)) should be equivalent.

llvm-svn: 370498

[TargetLowering] SimplifyDemandedBits ADD/SUB/MUL - correctly inherit SDNodeFlags from the original node.

Just disable NSW/NUW flags. This matches what we're already doing for the other situations for these nodes, it was just missed for the demanded constant case.

Noticed by inspection - confirmed in offline discussion with @spatel. I've checked we have test coverage in the x86 extract-bits.ll and extract-lowbits.ll tests

llvm-svn: 370497

llvm-svn: 370496

gcc and icc pass these types in zmm registers in zmm registers.

This patch implements a quick hack to override the register
type before calling convention handling to one that is legal.
Longer term we might want to do something similar to 256-bit
integer registers on AVX1 where we just split all the operations.

Fixes PR42957

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66708

llvm-svn: 370495

Missed these when I hadded the enum entries

llvm-svn: 370494

llvm-svn: 370492

Summary:
MTE allows memory access to bypass tag check iff the address argument
is [SP, #imm]. This change takes advantage of this to demote uses of
tagged addresses to regular FrameIndex operands, reducing register
pressure in large functions.

MO_TAGGED target flag is used to signal that the FrameIndex operand
refers to memory that might be tagged, and needs to be handled with
care. Such operand must be lowered to [SP, #imm] directly, without a
scratch register.

The transformation pass attempts to predict when the offset will be
out of range and disable the optimization.
AArch64RegisterInfo::eliminateFrameIndex has an escape hatch in case
this prediction has been wrong, but it is quite inefficient and should
be avoided.

Reviewers: pcc, vitalybuka, ostannard

Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66457

llvm-svn: 370490

llvm-svn: 370489

getLoadStorePointerOperand().
Reviewer: hsaito, sebpop, reames, hfinkel, mkuper, bogner, haicheng,
arsenm, lattner, chandlerc, grosser, rengolin
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits, bmahjour
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66595

llvm-svn: 370486

llvm-svn: 370485

I'm looking at unfolding broadcast loads on AVX512 which will
require refactoring this code to select broadcast opcodes instead
of regular load/stores in some cases. Merging them to avoid
further complicating their interfaces.

llvm-svn: 370484

Summary:
Instead of recomputing information for call sites we now use the
function information directly. This is always valid and once we have
call site specific information we can improve here.

This patch also bootstraps attributes that are created on-demand through
an initial update call. Information that is known will then directly be
available in the new attribute without causing an iteration delay.

The tests show how this improves the iteration count.

Reviewers: sstefan1, uenoku

Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66781

llvm-svn: 370480

Summary:
Any pointer could have load/store users not only floating ones so we
move the manifest logic for alignment into the AAAlignImpl class.

Reviewers: uenoku, sstefan1

Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66922

llvm-svn: 370479

llvm-svn: 370478

Summary: Add missing tbuffer loads intrinsics in SimplifyDemandedVectorElts.

Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle

Reviewed By: arsenm

Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66926

llvm-svn: 370475

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66976

llvm-svn: 370474

Currenly we can encode the 'st_other' field of symbol using 3 fields.
'Visibility' is used to encode STV_* values.
'Other' is used to encode everything except the visibility, but it can't handle arbitrary values.
'StOther' is used to encode arbitrary values when 'Visibility'/'Other' are not helpfull enough.

'st_other' field is used to encode symbol visibility and platform-dependent
flags and values. Problem to encode it is that it consists of Visibility part (STV_* values)
which are enumeration values and the Other part, which is different and inconsistent.

For MIPS the Other part contains flags for all STO_MIPS_* values except STO_MIPS_MIPS16.
(Like comment in ELFDumper says: "Someones in their infinite wisdom decided to make
STO_MIPS_MIPS16 flag overlapped with other ST_MIPS_xxx flags."...)

And for PPC64 the Other part might actually encode any value.

This patch implements custom logic for handling the st_other and removes
'Visibility' and 'StOther' fields.

Here is an example of a new YAML style this patch allows:

- Name:  foo
  Other: [ 0x4 ]
- Name:  bar
  Other: [ STV_PROTECTED, 4 ]
- Name:  zed
  Other: [ STV_PROTECTED, STO_MIPS_OPTIONAL, 0xf8 ]

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66886

llvm-svn: 370472

llvm-svn: 370471

This is hidden behind a (scalar-only) isOneConstant(N1) check at the moment, but once we get around to adding vector support we need to ensure we're dealing with the scalar bitwidth, not the total.

llvm-svn: 370468

llvm-svn: 370467

llvm-svn: 370466

llvm-svn: 370465

llvm-svn: 370464

Summary:
Found a couple of places in the code where all the PHI nodes
of a MBB is updated, replacing references to one MBB by
reference to another MBB instead.

This patch simply refactors the code to use a common helper
(MachineBasicBlock::replacePhiUsesWith) for such PHI node
updates.

Reviewers: t.p.northover, arsenm, uabelho

Subscribers: wdng, hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66750

llvm-svn: 370463

Return a proper zero vector, just in case some elements are undef.

Noticed by inspection after dealing with a similar issue in PR43159.

llvm-svn: 370460

llvm-svn: 370459

--add-symbol to be specified with --new-symbol-visibility

llvm-svn: 370458

Summary: This patch adds an appropriate `initialize` method for `AANoAliasCallSiteArgument`.

Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66927

llvm-svn: 370456

Summary:
@mclow.lists brought up this issue up in IRC.
It is a reasonably common problem to compare some two values for equality.
Those may be just some integers, strings or arrays of integers.

In C, there is `memcmp()`, `bcmp()` functions.
In C++, there exists `std::equal()` algorithm.
One can also write that function manually.

libstdc++'s `std::equal()` is specialized to directly call `memcmp()` for
various types, but not `std::byte` from C++2a. https://godbolt.org/z/mx2ejJ

libc++ does not do anything like that, it simply relies on simple C++'s
`operator==()`. https://godbolt.org/z/er0Zwf (GOOD!)

So likely, there exists a certain performance opportunities.
Let's compare performance of naive `std::equal()` (no `memcmp()`) with one that
is using `memcmp()` (in this case, compiled with modified compiler). {F8768213}

```
#include <algorithm>
#include <cmath>
#include <cstdint>
#include <iterator>
#include <limits>
#include <random>
#include <type_traits>
#include <utility>
#include <vector>

#include "benchmark/benchmark.h"

template <class T>
bool equal(T* a, T* a_end, T* b) noexcept {
  for (; a != a_end; ++a, ++b) {
    if (*a != *b) return false;
  }
  return true;
}

template <typename T>
std::vector<T> getVectorOfRandomNumbers(size_t count) {
  std::random_device rd;
  std::mt19937 gen(rd());
  std::uniform_int_distribution<T> dis(std::numeric_limits<T>::min(),
                                       std::numeric_limits<T>::max());
  std::vector<T> v;
  v.reserve(count);
  std::generate_n(std::back_inserter(v), count,
                  [&dis, &gen]() { return dis(gen); });
  assert(v.size() == count);
  return v;
}

struct Identical {
  template <typename T>
  static std::pair<std::vector<T>, std::vector<T>> Gen(size_t count) {
    auto Tmp = getVectorOfRandomNumbers<T>(count);
    return std::make_pair(Tmp, std::move(Tmp));
  }
};

struct InequalHalfway {
  template <typename T>
  static std::pair<std::vector<T>, std::vector<T>> Gen(size_t count) {
    auto V0 = getVectorOfRandomNumbers<T>(count);
    auto V1 = V0;
    V1[V1.size() / size_t(2)]++;  // just change the value.
    return std::make_pair(std::move(V0), std::move(V1));
  }
};

template <class T, class Gen>
void BM_bcmp(benchmark::State& state) {
  const size_t Length = state.range(0);

  const std::pair<std::vector<T>, std::vector<T>> Data =
      Gen::template Gen<T>(Length);
  const std::vector<T>& a = Data.first;
  const std::vector<T>& b = Data.second;
  assert(a.size() == Length && b.size() == a.size());

  benchmark::ClobberMemory();
  benchmark::DoNotOptimize(a);
  benchmark::DoNotOptimize(a.data());
  benchmark::DoNotOptimize(b);
  benchmark::DoNotOptimize(b.data());

  for (auto _ : state) {
    const bool is_equal = equal(a.data(), a.data() + a.size(), b.data());
    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(is_equal);
  }
  state.SetComplexityN(Length);
  state.counters["eltcnt"] =
      benchmark::Counter(Length, benchmark::Counter::kIsIterationInvariant);
  state.counters["eltcnt/sec"] =
      benchmark::Counter(Length, benchmark::Counter::kIsIterationInvariantRate);
  const size_t BytesRead = 2 * sizeof(T) * Length;
  state.counters["bytes_read/iteration"] =
      benchmark::Counter(BytesRead, benchmark::Counter::kDefaults,
                         benchmark::Counter::OneK::kIs1024);
  state.counters["bytes_read/sec"] = benchmark::Counter(
      BytesRead, benchmark::Counter::kIsIterationInvariantRate,
      benchmark::Counter::OneK::kIs1024);
}

template <typename T>
static void CustomArguments(benchmark::internal::Benchmark* b) {
  const size_t L2SizeBytes = []() {
    for (const benchmark::CPUInfo::CacheInfo& I :
         benchmark::CPUInfo::Get().caches) {
      if (I.level == 2) return I.size;
    }
    return 0;
  }();
  // What is the largest range we can check to always fit within given L2 cache?
  const size_t MaxLen = L2SizeBytes / /*total bufs*/ 2 /
                        /*maximal elt size*/ sizeof(T) / /*safety margin*/ 2;
  b->RangeMultiplier(2)->Range(1, MaxLen)->Complexity(benchmark::oN);
}

BENCHMARK_TEMPLATE(BM_bcmp, uint8_t, Identical)
    ->Apply(CustomArguments<uint8_t>);
BENCHMARK_TEMPLATE(BM_bcmp, uint16_t, Identical)
    ->Apply(CustomArguments<uint16_t>);
BENCHMARK_TEMPLATE(BM_bcmp, uint32_t, Identical)
    ->Apply(CustomArguments<uint32_t>);
BENCHMARK_TEMPLATE(BM_bcmp, uint64_t, Identical)
    ->Apply(CustomArguments<uint64_t>);

BENCHMARK_TEMPLATE(BM_bcmp, uint8_t, InequalHalfway)
    ->Apply(CustomArguments<uint8_t>);
BENCHMARK_TEMPLATE(BM_bcmp, uint16_t, InequalHalfway)
    ->Apply(CustomArguments<uint16_t>);
BENCHMARK_TEMPLATE(BM_bcmp, uint32_t, InequalHalfway)
    ->Apply(CustomArguments<uint32_t>);
BENCHMARK_TEMPLATE(BM_bcmp, uint64_t, InequalHalfway)
    ->Apply(CustomArguments<uint64_t>);
```
{F8768210}
```
$ ~/src/googlebenchmark/tools/compare.py --no-utest benchmarks build-{old,new}/test/llvm-bcmp-bench
RUNNING: build-old/test/llvm-bcmp-bench --benchmark_out=/tmp/tmpb6PEUx
2019-04-25 21:17:11
Running build-old/test/llvm-bcmp-bench
Run on (8 X 4000 MHz CPU s)
CPU Caches:
  L1 Data 16K (x8)
  L1 Instruction 64K (x4)
  L2 Unified 2048K (x4)
  L3 Unified 8192K (x1)
Load Average: 0.65, 3.90, 4.14
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark                                         Time             CPU   Iterations UserCounters...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, Identical>/512000           432131 ns       432101 ns         1613 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=2.20706G/s eltcnt=825.856M eltcnt/sec=1.18491G/s
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, Identical>_BigO               0.86 N          0.86 N
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, Identical>_RMS                   8 %             8 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, Identical>/256000          161408 ns       161409 ns         4027 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=5.90843G/s eltcnt=1030.91M eltcnt/sec=1.58603G/s
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, Identical>_BigO              0.67 N          0.67 N
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, Identical>_RMS                 25 %            25 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, Identical>/128000           81497 ns        81488 ns         8415 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=11.7032G/s eltcnt=1077.12M eltcnt/sec=1.57078G/s
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, Identical>_BigO              0.71 N          0.71 N
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, Identical>_RMS                 42 %            42 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, Identical>/64000            50138 ns        50138 ns        10909 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=19.0209G/s eltcnt=698.176M eltcnt/sec=1.27647G/s
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, Identical>_BigO              0.84 N          0.84 N
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, Identical>_RMS                 27 %            27 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, InequalHalfway>/512000      192405 ns       192392 ns         3638 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=4.95694G/s eltcnt=1.86266G eltcnt/sec=2.66124G/s
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, InequalHalfway>_BigO          0.38 N          0.38 N
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, InequalHalfway>_RMS              3 %             3 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, InequalHalfway>/256000     127858 ns       127860 ns         5477 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=7.45873G/s eltcnt=1.40211G eltcnt/sec=2.00219G/s
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, InequalHalfway>_BigO         0.50 N          0.50 N
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, InequalHalfway>_RMS             0 %             0 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, InequalHalfway>/128000      49140 ns        49140 ns        14281 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=19.4072G/s eltcnt=1.82797G eltcnt/sec=2.60478G/s
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, InequalHalfway>_BigO         0.40 N          0.40 N
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, InequalHalfway>_RMS            18 %            18 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, InequalHalfway>/64000       32101 ns        32099 ns        21786 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=29.7101G/s eltcnt=1.3943G eltcnt/sec=1.99381G/s
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, InequalHalfway>_BigO         0.50 N          0.50 N
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, InequalHalfway>_RMS             1 %             1 %
RUNNING: build-new/test/llvm-bcmp-bench --benchmark_out=/tmp/tmpQ46PP0
2019-04-25 21:19:29
Running build-new/test/llvm-bcmp-bench
Run on (8 X 4000 MHz CPU s)
CPU Caches:
  L1 Data 16K (x8)
  L1 Instruction 64K (x4)
  L2 Unified 2048K (x4)
  L3 Unified 8192K (x1)
Load Average: 1.01, 2.85, 3.71
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark                                         Time             CPU   Iterations UserCounters...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, Identical>/512000            18593 ns        18590 ns        37565 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=51.2991G/s eltcnt=19.2333G eltcnt/sec=27.541G/s
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, Identical>_BigO               0.04 N          0.04 N
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, Identical>_RMS                  37 %            37 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, Identical>/256000           18950 ns        18948 ns        37223 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=50.3324G/s eltcnt=9.52909G eltcnt/sec=13.511G/s
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, Identical>_BigO              0.08 N          0.08 N
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, Identical>_RMS                 34 %            34 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, Identical>/128000           18627 ns        18627 ns        37895 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=51.198G/s eltcnt=4.85056G eltcnt/sec=6.87168G/s
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, Identical>_BigO              0.16 N          0.16 N
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, Identical>_RMS                 35 %            35 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, Identical>/64000            18855 ns        18855 ns        37458 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=50.5791G/s eltcnt=2.39731G eltcnt/sec=3.3943G/s
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, Identical>_BigO              0.32 N          0.32 N
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, Identical>_RMS                 33 %            33 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, InequalHalfway>/512000        9570 ns         9569 ns        73500 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=99.6601G/s eltcnt=37.632G eltcnt/sec=53.5046G/s
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, InequalHalfway>_BigO          0.02 N          0.02 N
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, InequalHalfway>_RMS             29 %            29 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, InequalHalfway>/256000       9547 ns         9547 ns        74343 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=99.8971G/s eltcnt=19.0318G eltcnt/sec=26.8159G/s
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, InequalHalfway>_BigO         0.04 N          0.04 N
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, InequalHalfway>_RMS            29 %            29 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, InequalHalfway>/128000       9396 ns         9394 ns        73521 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=101.518G/s eltcnt=9.41069G eltcnt/sec=13.6255G/s
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, InequalHalfway>_BigO         0.08 N          0.08 N
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, InequalHalfway>_RMS            30 %            30 %
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, InequalHalfway>/64000        9499 ns         9498 ns        73802 bytes_read/iteration=1000k bytes_read/sec=100.405G/s eltcnt=4.72333G eltcnt/sec=6.73808G/s
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, InequalHalfway>_BigO         0.16 N          0.16 N
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, InequalHalfway>_RMS            28 %            28 %
Comparing build-old/test/llvm-bcmp-bench to build-new/test/llvm-bcmp-bench
Benchmark                                                  Time             CPU      Time Old      Time New       CPU Old       CPU New
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, Identical>/512000                      -0.9570         -0.9570        432131         18593        432101         18590
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, Identical>/256000                     -0.8826         -0.8826        161408         18950        161409         18948
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, Identical>/128000                     -0.7714         -0.7714         81497         18627         81488         18627
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, Identical>/64000                      -0.6239         -0.6239         50138         18855         50138         18855
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint8_t, InequalHalfway>/512000                 -0.9503         -0.9503        192405          9570        192392          9569
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint16_t, InequalHalfway>/256000                -0.9253         -0.9253        127858          9547        127860          9547
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint32_t, InequalHalfway>/128000                -0.8088         -0.8088         49140          9396         49140          9394
<...>
BM_bcmp<uint64_t, InequalHalfway>/64000                 -0.7041         -0.7041         32101          9499         32099          9498
```

What can we tell from the benchmark?
* Performance of naive equality check somewhat improves with element size,
  maxing out at eltcnt/sec=1.58603G/s for uint16_t, or bytes_read/sec=19.0209G/s
  for uint64_t. I think, that instability implies performance problems.
* Performance of `memcmp()`-aware benchmark always maxes out at around
  bytes_read/sec=51.2991G/s for every type. That is 2.6x the throughput of the
  naive variant!
* eltcnt/sec metric for the `memcmp()`-aware benchmark maxes out at
  eltcnt/sec=27.541G/s for uint8_t (was: eltcnt/sec=1.18491G/s, so 24x) and
  linearly decreases with element size.
  For uint64_t, it's ~4x+ the elements/second.
* The call obvious is more pricey than the loop, with small element count.
  As it can be seen from the full output {F8768210}, the `memcmp()` is almost
  universally worse, independent of the element size (and thus buffer size) when
  element count is less than 8.

So all in all, bcmp idiom does indeed pose untapped performance headroom.
This diff does implement said idiom recognition. I think a reasonable test
coverage is present, but do tell if there is anything obvious missing.

Now, quality. This does succeed to build and pass the test-suite, at least
without any non-bundled elements. {F8768216} {F8768217}
This transform fires 91 times:
```
$ /build/test-suite/utils/compare.py -m loop-idiom.NumBCmp result-new.json
Tests: 1149
Metric: loop-idiom.NumBCmp

Program                                         result-new

MultiSourc...Benchmarks/7zip/7zip-benchmark    79.00
MultiSource/Applications/d/make_dparser         3.00
SingleSource/UnitTests/vla                      2.00
MultiSource/Applications/Burg/burg              1.00
MultiSourc.../Applications/JM/lencod/lencod     1.00
MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon            1.00
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet            1.00
MultiSourc...e/Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs     1.00
MultiSourc...gs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc     1.00
MultiSourc...Prolangs-C/simulator/simulator     1.00
```
The size changes are:
I'm not sure what's going on with SingleSource/UnitTests/vla.test yet, did not look.
```
$ /build/test-suite/utils/compare.py -m size..text result-{old,new}.json --filter-hash
Tests: 1149
Same hash: 907 (filtered out)
Remaining: 242
Metric: size..text

Program                                        result-old result-new diff
test-suite...ingleSource/UnitTests/vla.test   753.00     833.00     10.6%
test-suite...marks/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test   1001697.00 966657.00  -3.5%
test-suite...ngs-C/simulator/simulator.test   32369.00   32321.00   -0.1%
test-suite...plications/d/make_dparser.test   89585.00   89505.00   -0.1%
test-suite...ce/Applications/Burg/burg.test   40817.00   40785.00   -0.1%
test-suite.../Applications/lemon/lemon.test   47281.00   47249.00   -0.1%
test-suite...TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc.test   250065.00  250113.00   0.0%
test-suite...chmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs.test   149889.00  149873.00  -0.0%
test-suite...ications/JM/lencod/lencod.test   769585.00  769569.00  -0.0%
test-suite.../Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet.test   770049.00  770049.00   0.0%
test-suite...HMARK_ANISTROPIC_DIFFUSION/128    NaN        NaN        nan%
test-suite...HMARK_ANISTROPIC_DIFFUSION/256    NaN        NaN        nan%
test-suite...CHMARK_ANISTROPIC_DIFFUSION/64    NaN        NaN        nan%
test-suite...CHMARK_ANISTROPIC_DIFFUSION/32    NaN        NaN        nan%
test-suite...ENCHMARK_BILATERAL_FILTER/64/4    NaN        NaN        nan%
Geomean difference                                                   nan%
         result-old    result-new       diff
count  1.000000e+01  10.00000      10.000000
mean   3.152090e+05  311695.40000  0.006749
std    3.790398e+05  372091.42232  0.036605
min    7.530000e+02  833.00000    -0.034981
25%    4.243300e+04  42401.00000  -0.000866
50%    1.197370e+05  119689.00000 -0.000392
75%    6.397050e+05  639705.00000 -0.000005
max    1.001697e+06  966657.00000  0.106242
```

I don't have timings though.

And now to the code. The basic idea is to completely replace the whole loop.
If we can't fully kill it, don't transform.
I have left one or two comments in the code, so hopefully it can be understood.

Also, there is a few TODO's that i have left for follow-ups:
* widening of `memcmp()`/`bcmp()`
* step smaller than the comparison size
* Metadata propagation
* more than two blocks as long as there is still a single backedge?
* ???

Reviewers: reames, fhahn, mkazantsev, chandlerc, craig.topper, courbet

Reviewed By: courbet

Subscribers: hiraditya, xbolva00, nikic, jfb, gchatelet, courbet, llvm-commits, mclow.lists

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61144

llvm-svn: 370454

Summary:
The internal `Builder` is private, which means there is
currently no way to set the debuginfo locations for `SCEVExpander`.
This only adds the wrappers, but does not use them anywhere.

Reviewers: mkazantsev, sanjoy, gberry, jyknight, dneilson

Reviewed By: sanjoy

Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61007

llvm-svn: 370453

Summary:
Change LiveDebugValues so that it inserts entry values after the bundle
which contains the clobbering instruction. Previously it would insert
the debug value after the bundle head using insertAfter(), breaking the
bundle.

Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk

Reviewed By: vsk

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #debug-info, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66888

llvm-svn: 370448

The `immarg` attribute was added in r355981.

llvm-svn: 370443

llvm-svn: 370442

Summary:
It is not used. It uses macro-based unrolling instead of variadic
templates, so it is not idiomatic anymore, and therefore it is a
questionable API to keep "just in case".

Subscribers: mgorny, dmgreen, dexonsmith, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66961

llvm-svn: 370441

Extend WindowsResourceParser to support using a ResourceSectionRef for
loading resources from an object file.

Only allow merging resource object files in mingw mode; keep the
existing error on multiple resource objects in link mode.

If there only is one resource object file and no .res resources,
don't parse and recreate the .rsrc section, but just link it in without
inspecting it. This allows users to produce any .rsrc section (outside
of what the parser supports), just like before. (I don't have a specific
need for this, but it reduces the risk of this new feature.)

Separate out the .rsrc section chunks in InputFiles.cpp, and only include
them in the list of section chunks to link if we've determined that there
only was one single resource object. (We need to keep other chunks from
those object files, as they can legitimately contain other sections as
well, in addition to .rsrc section chunks.)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66824

llvm-svn: 370436

Instead of updating a global variable counter for the next index of
strings and data blobs, pass along a reference to actual data/string
vectors and let the TreeNode insertion methods add their data/strings to
the vectors when a new entry is needed.

Additionally, if the resource tree had duplicates, that were ignored
with -force:multipleres in lld, we no longer store all versions of the
duplicated resource data, now we only keep the one that actually ends
up referenced.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66823

llvm-svn: 370435

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66821

llvm-svn: 370434

This allows llvm-readobj to print the contents of each resource
when printing resources from an object file or executable, like it
already does for plain .res files.

This requires providing the whole COFFObjectFile to ResourceSectionRef.

This supports both object files and executables. For executables,
the DataRVA field is used as is to look up the right section.

For object files, ideally we would need to complete linking of them
and fix up all relocations to know what the DataRVA field would end up
being. In practice, the only thing that makes sense for an RVA field
is an ADDR32NB relocation. Thus, find a relocation pointing at this
field, verify that it has the expected type, locate the symbol it
points at, look up the section the symbol points at, and read from the
right offset in that section.

This works both for GNU windres object files (which use one single
.rsrc section, with all relocations against the base of the .rsrc
section, with the original value of the DataRVA field being the
offset of the data from the beginning of the .rsrc section) and
cvtres object files (with two separate .rsrc$01 and .rsrc$02 sections,
and one symbol per data entry, with the original pre-relocated DataRVA
field being set to zero).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66820

llvm-svn: 370433

Add custom lowering for G_UITOFP for MIPS32.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66930

llvm-svn: 370432