Skip to content
Commit ac583610 authored by Greg Clayton's avatar Greg Clayton
Browse files

Rewrote the initial DW_OP_piece support to be able to support opcodes like:

DW_OP_fbreg(N) DW_OP_piece(4) DW_OP_fbreg(M) DW_OP_piece(8)
DW_OP_fbreg(N) DW_OP_piece(4) DW_OP_piece(8)

The first grabs 4 bytes from FP+N followed by 8 bytes from FP+M, the second grabs 4 bytes from FP+N followed by zero filling 8 bytes which are unavailable. Of course regiters are stuff supported:

DW_OP_reg3 DW_OP_piece(4) DW_OP_reg8 DW_OP_piece(8)

The fix does the following:
1 - don't push the full piece value onto the stack, keep it on the side
2 - fill zeros for DW_OP_piece(N) opcodes that have nothing on the stack (instead of previously consuming the full piece that was pushed onto the stack)
3 - simplify the logic

<rdar://problem/16930524>

llvm-svn: 214415
parent 0f4fbf17
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment