[DSE] Use optimized access if available for redundant store elimination.
Using the optimized access enables additional optimizations in cases where the defining access is a non-aliasing store. Alternatively we could also walk upwards and skip non-aliasing defs here, but my experiments so far showed that this will noticeably increase compile-time for little extra gain compared to just using the optimized access. Improvements of dse.NumRedundantStores on MultiSource/CINT2006/CPF2006 on X86 with -O3: test-suite...-typeset/consumer-typeset.test 1.00 76.00 7500.0% test-suite.../Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet.test 3.00 12.00 300.0% test-suite...006/453.povray/453.povray.test 3.00 6.00 100.0% test-suite...telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm.test 1.00 2.00 100.0% test-suite...ediabench/gsm/toast/toast.test 1.00 2.00 100.0% test-suite...marks/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 1.00 2.00 100.0% test-suite...ications/JM/lencod/lencod.test 7.00 10.00 42.9% test-suite...6/464.h264ref/464.h264ref.test 6.00 8.00 33.3% test-suite...ications/JM/ldecod/ldecod.test 6.00 7.00 16.7% test-suite...006/447.dealII/447.dealII.test 33.00 33.00 0.0% test-suite...6/471.omnetpp/471.omnetpp.test NaN 1.00 nan% test-suite...006/450.soplex/450.soplex.test NaN 2.00 nan% test-suite.../CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc.test NaN 7.00 nan% test-suite...lications/ClamAV/clamscan.test NaN 1.00 nan% test-suite...CI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000.test NaN 3.00 nan% Follow-up to D111727. Reviewed By: nikic Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112315
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment