Skip to content
Commit dadbe88a authored by Arthur O'Dwyer's avatar Arthur O'Dwyer
Browse files

[libc++] Fix std::to_address(array).

There were basically two bugs here:

When C++20 `to_address` is called on `int arr[10]`, then `const _Ptr&` becomes
a reference to a const array, and then we dispatch to `__to_address<const int(&)[10]>`,
which, oops, gives us a `const int*` result instead of an `int*` result.
Solution: We need to provide the two standard-specified overloads of
`std::to_address` in exactly the same way that we provide two overloads
of `__to_address`.

When `__to_address` is called on a pointer type, `__to_address(const _Ptr&)`
is disabled so we successfully avoid trying to instantiate pointer_traits of
that pointer type. But when it's called on an array type, it's not disabled
for array types, so we go ahead and instantiate pointer_traits<int[10]>,
which goes boom. Solution: We need to disable `__to_address(const _Ptr&)`
for both pointer and array types. Also disable it for function types,
so that they get the nice error message; and put a test on it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109331
parent 84169fb6
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment