This is mostly extracted from http://reviews.llvm.org/D18960.

The general idea for tlsdesc is that the two GD got entries are used
for a function pointer and its argument. The dynamic linker sets
both. In the non-dlopen case the dynamic linker sets the function to
the identity and the argument to the offset in the tls block.

All that the static linker has to do in the non-dlopen case is
relocate the code to point to the got entries and create a dynamic
relocation.

The dlopen case is more complicated, but can be implemented in another patch.

llvm-svn: 271569

Patch implements next relaxation from latest ABI:

"Convert memory operand of test and binop into immediate operand, where binop is one of adc, add, and, cmp, or,
sbb, sub, xor instructions, when position-independent code is disabled."

It is described in System V Application Binary Interface AMD64 Architecture Processor 
Supplement Draft Version 0.99.8 (https://github.com/hjl-tools/x86-psABI/wiki/x86-64-psABI-r249.pdf, 
B.2 "B.2 Optimize GOTPCRELX Relocations").

Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20793

llvm-svn: 271405

This reverts commit r271365.
Sorry, wrong branch.

llvm-svn: 271366

llvm-svn: 271365

In case of MIPS, GP-relative relocations always resolve to a definition
in a regular input file, ignoring the one-definition rule. Such
relocations are used to setup GP relative offsets in a function's
prologue. So we, for example, should not attempt to create a dynamic
relocation even if the target symbol is preemptible.

Fixes bug 27880.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20664

llvm-svn: 271100

llvm-svn: 270847

System V Application Binary Interface AMD64 Architecture Processor Supplement Draft Version 0.99.8 
(https://github.com/hjl-tools/x86-psABI/wiki/x86-64-psABI-r249.pdf, B.2 "B.2 Optimize GOTPCRELX Relocations")
introduces possible relaxations for R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX and R_X86_64_REX_GOTPCRELX.

That patch implements the next relaxation: 
mov foo@GOTPCREL(%rip), %reg => lea foo(%rip), %reg
and also opens door for implementing all other ones.

Implementation was suggested by Rafael Ávila de Espíndola with few additions and testcases by myself.

Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15779

llvm-svn: 270705

llvm-svn: 270652

scanReloc and the functions on which scanReloc depends is in total
more than 600 lines of code. Since scanReloc does not depend on Writer,
it is better to move it into a separate file.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20554

llvm-svn: 270606