Module::getOrInsertFunction is using C-style vararg instead of
variadic templates.

From a user prospective, it forces the use of an annoying nullptr
to mark the end of the vararg, and there's not type checking on the
arguments. The variadic template is an obvious solution to both
issues.

llvm-svn: 299925

Summary: Fix coverity cid 1374240

Reviewers: dberlin

Reviewed By: dberlin

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31928

llvm-svn: 299924

This patch enables LSan for arm Linux.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29586

llvm-svn: 299923

Previously in r297800, a work-around was created to use TSC emulation on x86_64 when RDTSCP was not available on the host. A similar change was needed in the file xray_fdr_logging.cc which this patch ports over to that file.

Eventually the code should be refactored as there will be 3 locations with the same code, but that can be done as a separate step. This patch is just to keep the test from failing on my machine due to an illegal instruction since RDTSCP is not available on my x86_64 linux VM.

Reviewers: dberris

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31909

llvm-svn: 299922

This is a compiler part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D29586. Enable LSan on arm Linux.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31760

llvm-svn: 299921

Reviewers: alexfh

Reviewed By: alexfh

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang-tools-extra

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31860

llvm-svn: 299920

Reviewers: djasper

Reviewed By: djasper

Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, klimek, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31408

llvm-svn: 299919

llvm-svn: 299918

[InstCombine] Refinement of r299915. Only consider a ConstantVector for Neg if all the elements are Undef or ConstantInt.

llvm-svn: 299917

Summary:
We can move this functionality into LLVM's tools instead, as it no
longer is strictly required for the compiler-rt testing infrastructure.
It also is blocking the successful bootstrapping of the clang compiler
due to a missing virtual destructor in one of the flag parsing library.

Since this binary isn't critical for the XRay runtime testing effort
anymore (yet), we remove it in the meantime with the hope of moving the
functionality in LLVM proper instead.

Reviewers: kpw, pelikan, rnk, seurer, eugenis

Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31926

llvm-svn: 299916

llvm-svn: 299915

Suggested-by: Roman Gareev <gareevroman@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 299914

llvm-svn: 299913

(h/t to Chandler for pointing this out)

The test in question was not at all testing what it was supposed to
test.  We do not //care// about placing `!make.implicit` in inner
constant branch (since it will be folded away anyway).  We care about
placing `!make.implicit` in the outer branch that switches between
either version of the loop.

Having said that, it is _correct_ to leave behind the `!make.implicit`
in the inner branch, but there is no need to do so.

llvm-svn: 299912

When allowed, we can hoist a division out of a loop in favor of a
multiplication by the reciprocal. Fixes PR32157.

Patch by vit9696!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30819

llvm-svn: 299911

Check the legality of ISD::[US]MULO to see whether
Intrinsic::[us]mul_with_overflow will legalize into a function call (and, thus,
will use the CTR register).  Fixes PR32485.

Patch by Tim Neumann!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31790

llvm-svn: 299910

llvm-svn: 299909

We were removing comdats from externalized functions (function declarations
can't be comdat), but were not doing the same for variable. Failure to do this
would cause bugpoint to fail ("Declaration may not be in a Comdat!").

llvm-svn: 299908

llvm-svn: 299907

llvm-svn: 299906

llvm-svn: 299905

It's not ready yet this was an accidental commit :(

This reverts r299903

llvm-svn: 299904

Fixes PR 32607.

llvm-svn: 299903

docs: Use the term "whole-program devirtualization" instead of "virtual function call optimization".

The former term is probably more familiar to users. Also add references to
the command line flags used to enable the features described in the doc.

llvm-svn: 299902

llvm-svn: 299901

The getter was equivalent to AttributeList::getAttributes(unsigned),
which seems like a better way to express getting the AttributeSet for a
given index. This static helper was only used in one place anyway.

The constructor doesn't benefit from inlining and doesn't need to be in
a header.

llvm-svn: 299900

This re-lands r299875.

I introduced a bug in Clang code responsible for replacing K&R, no
prototype declarations with a real function definition with a prototype.
The bug was here:

       // Collect any return attributes from the call.
  -    if (oldAttrs.hasAttributes(llvm::AttributeList::ReturnIndex))
  -      newAttrs.push_back(llvm::AttributeList::get(newFn->getContext(),
  -                                                  oldAttrs.getRetAttributes()));
  +    newAttrs.push_back(oldAttrs.getRetAttributes());

Previously getRetAttributes() carried AttributeList::ReturnIndex in its
AttributeList. Now that we return the AttributeSetNode* directly, it no
longer carries that index, and we call this overload with a single node:
  AttributeList::get(LLVMContext&, ArrayRef<AttributeSetNode*>)

That aborted with an assertion on x86_32 targets. I added an explicit
triple to the test and added CHECKs to help find issues like this in the
future sooner.

llvm-svn: 299899

llvm-svn: 299898

llvm-svn: 299897

Summary:
Set up the proper stack frame for the thread spawned in internal_clone,
the current code does not follow ABI (and causes SEGV trying to use this
malformed frame).

Reviewers: wschmidt

Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31555

llvm-svn: 299896

This Placates GCC7 with -Werror. Also, clang-format the assertions
while I'm here.

llvm-svn: 299895

llvm-svn: 299894

Differential Revision:  https://reviews.llvm.org/D31818

llvm-svn: 299893

The math works out where it can actually be counter-productive. The probability
calculations correctly handle the case where the alternative is 0 probability,
rely on those calculations.

Includes a test case that demonstrates the problem.

llvm-svn: 299892

Qin may be large, and Succ may be more frequent than BB. Take these both into
account when deciding if tail-duplication is profitable.

llvm-svn: 299891

Merging identical blocks when it doesn't reduce fallthrough. It is common for
the blocks created from critical edge splitting to be identical. We would like
to merge these blocks whenever doing so would not reduce fallthrough.

llvm-svn: 299890

llvm-svn: 299889

LLVM makes several assumptions about address space 0. However,
alloca is presently constrained to always return this address space.
There's no real way to avoid using alloca, so without this
there is no way to opt out of these assumptions.

The problematic assumptions include:
- That the pointer size used for the stack is the same size as
  the code size pointer, which is also the maximum sized pointer.

- That 0 is an invalid, non-dereferencable pointer value.

These are problems for AMDGPU because alloca is used to
implement the private address space, which uses a 32-bit
index as the pointer value. Other pointers are 64-bit
and behave more like LLVM's notion of generic address
space. By changing the address space used for allocas,
we can change our generic pointer type to be LLVM's generic
pointer type which does have similar properties.

llvm-svn: 299888

llvm-svn: 299887

This code will need to be taught to handle string tables and it's better if
there is only one copy of it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31829

llvm-svn: 299886