llvm-svn: 183078

llvm-svn: 182590

This resurrects r179957, but adds code that makes sure we don't touch
atomic/volatile stores:

This transformation will transform a conditional store with a preceeding
uncondtional store to the same location:

 a[i] =
 may-alias with a[i] load
 if (cond)
   a[i] = Y

into an unconditional store.

 a[i] = X
 may-alias with a[i] load
 tmp = cond ? Y : X;
 a[i] = tmp

We assume that on average the cost of a mispredicted branch is going to be
higher than the cost of a second store to the same location, and that the
secondary benefits of creating a bigger basic block for other optimizations to
work on outway the potential case where the branch would be correctly predicted
and the cost of the executing the second store would be noticably reflected in
performance.

hmmer's execution time improves by 30% on an imac12,2 on ref data sets. With
this change we are on par with gcc's performance (gcc also performs this
transformation). There was a 1.2 % performance improvement on a ARM swift chip.
Other tests in the test-suite+external seem to be mostly uninfluenced in my
experiments:
This optimization was triggered on 41 tests such that the executable was
different before/after the patch. Only 1 out of the 40 tests (dealII) was
reproducable below 100% (by about .4%). Given that hmmer benefits so much I
believe this to be a fair trade off.

llvm-svn: 180731

There is the temptation to make this tranform dependent on target information as
it is not going to be beneficial on all (sub)targets. Therefore, we should
probably do this in MI Early-Ifconversion.

This reverts commit r179957. Original commit message:

"SimplifyCFG: If convert single conditional stores

This transformation will transform a conditional store with a preceeding
uncondtional store to the same location:

a[i] =
may-alias with a[i] load
if (cond)
    a[i] = Y
into an unconditional store.

a[i] = X
may-alias with a[i] load
tmp = cond ? Y : X;
a[i] = tmp

We assume that on average the cost of a mispredicted branch is going to be
higher than the cost of a second store to the same location, and that the
secondary benefits of creating a bigger basic block for other optimizations to
work on outway the potential case were the branch would be correctly predicted
and the cost of the executing the second store would be noticably reflected in
performance.

hmmer's execution time improves by 30% on an imac12,2 on ref data sets. With
this change we are on par with gcc's performance (gcc also performs this
transformation). There was a 1.2 % performance improvement on a ARM swift chip.
Other tests in the test-suite+external seem to be mostly uninfluenced in my
experiments:
This optimization was triggered on 41 tests such that the executable was
different before/after the patch. Only 1 out of the 40 tests (dealII) was
reproducable below 100% (by about .4%). Given that hmmer benefits so much I
believe this to be a fair trade off.

I am going to watch performance numbers across the builtbots and will revert
this if anything unexpected comes up."

llvm-svn: 179980

This transformation will transform a conditional store with a preceeding
uncondtional store to the same location:

 a[i] =
 may-alias with a[i] load
 if (cond)
   a[i] = Y

into an unconditional store.

 a[i] = X
 may-alias with a[i] load
 tmp = cond ? Y : X;
 a[i] = tmp

We assume that on average the cost of a mispredicted branch is going to be
higher than the cost of a second store to the same location, and that the
secondary benefits of creating a bigger basic block for other optimizations to
work on outway the potential case were the branch would be correctly predicted
and the cost of the executing the second store would be noticably reflected in
performance.

hmmer's execution time improves by 30% on an imac12,2 on ref data sets. With
this change we are on par with gcc's performance (gcc also performs this
transformation). There was a 1.2 % performance improvement on a ARM swift chip.
Other tests in the test-suite+external seem to be mostly uninfluenced in my
experiments:
This optimization was triggered on 41 tests such that the executable was
different before/after the patch. Only 1 out of the 40 tests (dealII) was
reproducable below 100% (by about .4%). Given that hmmer benefits so much I
believe this to be a fair trade off.

I am going to watch performance numbers across the builtbots and will revert
this if anything unexpected comes up.

llvm-svn: 179957

If a switch instruction has a case for every possible value of its type,
with the same successor, SimplifyCFG would replace it with an icmp ult,
but the computation of the bound overflows in that case, which inverts
the test.

Patch by Jed Davis!

llvm-svn: 179587

An invoke may require a table entry. For instance, when the function it calls
is expected to throw.
<rdar://problem/13360379>

llvm-svn: 176827

Fixes rdar:13349374.

Volatile loads and stores need to be preserved even if the language
standard says they are undefined. "volatile" in this context means "get
out of the way compiler, let my platform handle it".

Additionally, this is the only way I know of with llvm to write to the
first page (when hardware allows) without dropping to assembly.

llvm-svn: 176599

out bug fixes, or functionality preserving refactorings.

llvm-svn: 173610

loops over instructions in the basic block or the use-def list of the
value, neither of which are really efficient when repeatedly querying
about values in the same basic block.

What's more, we already know that the CondBB is small, and so we can do
a much more efficient test by counting the uses in CondBB, and seeing if
those account for all of the uses.

Finally, we shouldn't blanket fail on any such instruction, instead we
should conservatively assume that those instructions are part of the
cost.

Note that this actually fixes a bug in the pass because
isUsedInBasicBlock has a really terrible bug in it. I'll fix that in my
next commit, but the fix for it would make this code suddenly take the
compile time hit I thought it already was taking, so I wanted to go
ahead and migrate this code to a faster & better pattern.

The bug in isUsedInBasicBlock was also causing other tests to test the
wrong thing entirely: for example we weren't actually disabling
speculation for floating point operations as intended (and tested), but
the test passed because we failed to speculate them due to the
isUsedInBasicBlock failure.

llvm-svn: 173417

Original commit message:
Plug TTI into the speculation logic, giving it a real cost interface
that can be specialized by targets.

The goal here is not to be more aggressive, but to just be more accurate
with very obvious cases. There are instructions which are known to be
truly free and which were not being modeled as such in this code -- see
the regression test which is distilled from an inner loop of zlib.

Everywhere the TTI cost model is insufficiently conservative I've added
explicit checks with FIXME comments to go add proper modelling of these
cost factors.

If this causes regressions, the likely solution is to make TTI even more
conservative in its cost estimates, but test cases will help here.

llvm-svn: 173357

of stage2 in a bootstrap. Still investigating....

llvm-svn: 173343

that can be specialized by targets.

The goal here is not to be more aggressive, but to just be more accurate
with very obvious cases. There are instructions which are known to be
truly free and which were not being modeled as such in this code -- see
the regression test which is distilled from an inner loop of zlib.

Everywhere the TTI cost model is insufficiently conservative I've added
explicit checks with FIXME comments to go add proper modelling of these
cost factors.

If this causes regressions, the likely solution is to make TTI even more
conservative in its cost estimates, but test cases will help here.

llvm-svn: 173342

unfolded constant expressions rather than checking each one
independently.

llvm-svn: 173341

a cost fuction that seems both a bit ad-hoc and also poorly suited to
evaluating constant expressions.

Notably, it is missing any support for trivial expressions such as
'inttoptr'. I could fix this routine, but it isn't clear to me all of
the constraints its other users are operating under.

The core protection that seems relevant here is avoiding the formation
of a select instruction wich a further chain of select operations in
a constant expression operand. Just explicitly encode that constraint.

Also, update the comments and organization here to make it clear where
this needs to go -- this should be driven off of real cost measurements
which take into account the number of constants expressions and the
depth of the constant expression tree.

llvm-svn: 173340

terms of cost rather than hoisting a single instruction.

This does *not* change the cost model! We still set the cost threshold
at 1 here, it's just that we track it by accumulating cost rather than
by storing an instruction.

The primary advantage is that we no longer leave no-op intrinsics in the
basic block. For example, this will now move both debug info intrinsics
and a single instruction, instead of only moving the instruction and
leaving a basic block with nothing bug debug info intrinsics in it, and
those intrinsics now no longer ordered correctly with the hoisted value.

Instead, we now splice the entire conditional basic block's instruction
sequence.

This also places the code for checking the safety of hoisting next to
the code computing the cost.

Currently, the only observable side-effect of this change is that debug
info intrinsics are no longer abandoned. I'm not sure how to craft
a test case for this, and my real goal was the refactoring, but I'll
talk to Dave or Eric about how to add a test case for this.

llvm-svn: 173339

Previously, the code would scan the PHI nodes and build up a small
setvector of candidate value pairs in phi nodes to go and rewrite. Once
certain the rewrite could be performed, the code walks the set, and for
each one re-scans the entire PHI node list looking for nodes to rewrite
operands.

Instead, scan the PHI nodes once to check for hazards, and then scan it
a second time to rewrite the operands to selects. No set vector, and
a max of two scans.

The only downside is that we might form identical selects, but
instcombine or anything else should fold those easily, and it seems
unlikely to happen often.

llvm-svn: 173337

structure being analyzed. No functionality changed.

llvm-svn: 173334

tests. No need to pay the high cost when we're never going to do
anything.

No functionality changed.

llvm-svn: 173331

pretty in doxygen, adding some of the details actually present in
a classic example where this matters (a loop from gzip and many other
compression algorithms), and a cautionary note about the risks inherent
in the transform. This has come up on the mailing lists recently, and
I suspect folks reading this code could benefit from going and looking
at the MI pass that can really deal with these issues.

llvm-svn: 173329

used uninitialized, since it fails to understand that Array is only used when
SingleValue is not, and outputs a warning.  It also seems generally safer given
that the constructor is non-trivial and has plenty of early exits.

llvm-svn: 173242

through as a reference rather than a pointer. There is always *some*
implementation of this available, so this simplifies code by not having
to test for whether it is available or not.

Further, it turns out there were piles of places where SimplifyCFG was
recursing and not passing down either TD or TTI. These are fixed to be
more pedantically consistent even though I don't have any particular
cases where it would matter.

llvm-svn: 171691

longer would violate any dependency layering and it is in fact an
analysis. =]

llvm-svn: 171686

the ScalarTargetTransformInfo interface.

llvm-svn: 171617

into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.

There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.

The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.

I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).

I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.

llvm-svn: 171366

Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.

Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]

llvm-svn: 169131

We're iterating over a non-deterministically ordered container looking
for two saturating flags. To do this correctly, we have to saturate
both, and only stop looping if both saturate to their final value.
Otherwise, which flag we see first changes the result.

This is also a micro-optimization of the previous version as now we
don't go into the (possibly expensive) test logic once the first
violation of either constraint is detected.

llvm-svn: 168989

functionality changed.

Evan's commit r168970 moved the code that the primary comment in this
function referred to to the other end of the function without moving the
comment, and there has been a steady creep of "boolean" logic in it that
is simpler if handled via early exit. That way each special case can
have its own comments. I've also made the variable name a bit more
explanatory than "AllFit". This is in preparation to fix the
non-deterministic output of this function.

llvm-svn: 168988

the tables cannot fit in registers (i.e. bitmap), do not emit the table
if it's using an illegal type.

rdar://12779436

llvm-svn: 168970

Patch by Pekka Jääskeläinen!

llvm-svn: 168176

llvm-svn: 168058

llvm-svn: 168057

is available.

llvm-svn: 167552

getIntPtrType support for multiple address spaces via a pointer type,
and also introduced a crasher bug in the constant folder reported in
PR14233.

These commits also contained several problems that should really be
addressed before they are re-committed. I have avoided reverting various
cleanups to the DataLayout APIs that are reasonable to have moving
forward in order to reduce the amount of churn, and minimize the number
of commits that were reverted. I've also manually updated merge
conflicts and manually arranged for the getIntPtrType function to stay
in DataLayout and to be defined in a plausible way after this revert.

Thanks to Duncan for working through this exact strategy with me, and
Nick Lewycky for tracking down the really annoying crasher this
triggered. (Test case to follow in its own commit.)

After discussing with Duncan extensively, and based on a note from
Micah, I'm going to continue to back out some more of the more
problematic patches in this series in order to ensure we go into the
LLVM 3.2 branch with a reasonable story here. I'll send a note to
llvmdev explaining what's going on and why.

Summary of reverted revisions:

r166634: Fix a compiler warning with an unused variable.
r166607: Add some cleanup to the DataLayout changes requested by
         Chandler.
r166596: Revert "Back out r166591, not sure why this made it through
         since I cancelled the command. Bleh, sorry about this!
r166591: Delete a directory that wasn't supposed to be checked in yet.
r166578: Add in support for getIntPtrType to get the pointer type based
         on the address space.
llvm-svn: 167221

SimplifyCFG will have removed those cases for us.

llvm-svn: 167132

llvm-svn: 167130

 - Use 0 instead of NULL
 - Helper function for "dyn_cast, else lookup in the constant pool".

llvm-svn: 167121

llvm-svn: 167117

By propagating the value for the switch condition, LLVM can now build
lookup tables for code such as:

  switch (x) {
    case 1: return 5;
    case 2: return 42;
    case 3: case 4: case 5:
      return x - 123;
    default:
      return 123;
  }

Given that x is known for each case, "x - 123" becomes a constant for
cases 3, 4, and 5.

llvm-svn: 167115

When the switch-to-lookup tables transform landed in SimplifyCFG, it
was pointed out that this could be inappropriate for some targets.
Since there was no way at the time for the pass to know anything about
the target, an awkward reverse-transform was added in CodeGenPrepare
that turned lookup tables back into switches for some targets.

This patch uses the new TargetTransformInfo to determine if a
switch should be transformed, and removes
CodeGenPrepare::ConvertLoadToSwitch.

llvm-svn: 167011